Literature DB >> 18162274

The social nature of natural childbirth.

Becky Mansfield1.   

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a better understanding of what proponents of natural childbirth mean by "natural." Using a biosocial approach to birth that posits that all birth is both social and natural, the paper investigates how proponents represent the relationship between nature and society. The study asks about what kinds of nature-society relationships are expressed in proponents' representations of natural childbirth. The study examines how natural childbirth is represented by proponents in popular non-fictional English language books written for pregnant women. Claims in these books are not taken as reality, but are analyzed as ideas about nature-society relations. The central finding is that these authors simultaneously emphasize the naturalness of birth and showcase three types of social practices that they describe as being integral to natural childbirth: (1) activity during birth, (2) preparation before birth, and (3) social support, both in an individual and in a broader socio-cultural sense. At least for these authors, it is these social practices that allow natural childbirth to be natural. These findings on the social nature of natural childbirth challenge current social science scholarship, in which natural childbirth is characterized as an essentializing and nostalgic attempt to return to nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18162274     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  More than clinical waste? Placenta rituals among Australian home-birthing women.

Authors:  Emily Burns
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth.

Authors:  Ole Olsen; Jette A Clausen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

3.  Quality assessment of patient leaflets on misoprostol-induced labour: does written information adhere to international standards for patient involvement and informed consent?

Authors:  Jette Aaroe Clausen; Mette Juhl; Eva Rydahl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Making good care essential: The impact of increased obstetric interventions and decreased services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Kathleen F Rice; Sarah A Williams
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.349

Review 5.  Understanding childbirth practices as an organizational cultural phenomenon: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Roxana Behruzi; Marie Hatem; Lise Goulet; William Fraser; Chizuru Misago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  'It made you think twice' - an interview study of women's perception of a web-based decision aid concerning screening and diagnostic testing for fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Anna Sarkadi; Peter Lindgren; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Fundamentally uncaring: The differential multi-scalar impacts of COVID-19 in the U.S.

Authors:  Patricia J Lopez; Abigail H Neely
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.634

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.