Literature DB >> 18159979

Comparing Cox regression and parametric models for survival of patients with gastric carcinoma.

Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi1, Ebrahim Hajizadeh, Bijan Moghimi Dehkordi, Azadeh Safaee, Alireza Abadi, Mohammad Reza Zali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers in medical sciences often tend to prefer Cox semi-parametric instead of parametric models for survival analysis because of fewer assumptions but under certain circumstances, parametric models give more precise estimates. The objective of this study was to compare two survival regression methods - Cox regression and parametric models - in patients with gastric adenocarcinomas who registered at Taleghani hospital, Tehran.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 746 cases from February 2003 through January 2007. Gender, age at diagnosis, family history of cancer, tumor size and pathologic distant of metastasis were selected as potential prognostic factors and entered into the parametric and semi parametric models. Weibull, exponential and lognormal regression were performed as parametric models with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and standardized of parameter estimates to compare the efficiency of models.
RESULTS: The survival results from both Cox and Parametric models showed that patients who were older than 45 years at diagnosis had an increased risk for death, followed by greater tumor size and presence of pathologic distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION: In multivariate analysis Cox and Exponential are similar. Although it seems that there may not be a single model that is substantially better than others, in univariate analysis the data strongly supported the log normal regression among parametric models and it can be lead to more precise results as an alternative to Cox.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18159979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  28 in total

1.  A Comparison of Staging Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Multicenter US Cohort.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Steve Scaglione; Yumeng Li; Corey Powell; Olutola A Yerokun; Pauline Devlin; Shaham Mumtaz; Sahil Mittal; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Clinicopathological significance of glucose transporter protein-1 overexpression in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jian Fan; Jiong Mei; Ming-Zhu Zhang; Feng Yuan; Shan-Zhu Li; Guang-Rong Yu; Long-Hui Chen; Qian Tang; Cory J Xian
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Comparison of the performances of survival analysis regression models for analysis of conception modes and risk of type-1 diabetes among 1985-2015 Swedish birth cohort.

Authors:  Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe; Emma Norrman; Christina Bergh; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Max Petzold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stratified versus usual care for the management of primary care patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC RCT.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Kika Konstantinou; Martyn Lewis; Reuben Ogollah; Benjamin Saunders; Jesse Kigozi; Sue Jowett; Bernadette Bartlam; Majid Artus; Jonathan C Hill; Gemma Hughes; Christian D Mallen; Elaine M Hay; Danielle A van der Windt; Michelle Robinson; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Parametric survival analysis using R: Illustration with lung cancer data.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar; Prashant Kr Sonker; Agni Saroj; Aanchal Jain; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Rakesh Kr Saroj
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-07-24

6.  A New Prognostic Model Based on Albumin-Bilirubin Grade for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond the Milan Criteria.

Authors:  Shu-Yein Ho; Po-Hong Liu; Chia-Yang Hsu; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Chien-Wei Su; Hao-Jan Lei; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Ming-Chih Hou; Teh-Ia Huo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Accelerated failure time models provide a useful statistical framework for aging research.

Authors:  William R Swindell
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.032

8.  Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hui P Zhu; Xin Xia; Chuan H Yu; Ahmed Adnan; Shun F Liu; Yu K Du
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Survey of Patients with Cervical Cancer in Hospital UniversitiSains Malaysia: Survival Data Analysis with Time-Dependent Covariate.

Authors:  Nurliyana Juhan; Nuradhiathy Abd Razak; Yong Zulina Zubairi; Muhammad Naeem Khattak; Nyi Nyi Naing
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Evaluation of parametric models by the prediction error in colorectal cancer survival analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Baghestani; Mahmood Reza Gohari; Arezoo Orooji; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.