Literature DB >> 18158984

Clinical course of high-grade glioma patients with a "biopsy-only" surgical approach: a need for individualised treatment.

C Balaña1, J Capellades, P Teixidor, I Roussos, R Ballester, M Cuello, A Arellano, R Florensa, R Rosell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: 'Biopsy-only' high-grade glioma (HGG) patients get limited benefit from post-operative treatments, and as a group, negatively impact median survival outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment and overall survival of HGG patients with a 'biopsy- only' surgical approach diagnosed between 1997 and 2005 at a University Hospital in Spain.
RESULTS: In 31% of 294 suspected gliomas, only a diagnostic biopsy was undertaken. Reasons for 'biopsy-only' for all patients were either location in eloquent areas: (motor area 18.7%, language area 25,3%, basal ganglia 7.7%, visual area 4.4%) or extension of the disease (corpus callosum invasion 14.3% and multicentricity/multifocality 28.6%). Seventy-four patients (80.4%) were HGG: 26% of all grade IV and 49% of all grade III tumours. For these patients, post-operative Karnofsky Performance Status of over 70%, median age and median survival were, respectively: 64 and 70%, 60.7 and 57 years old, and 23.1 and 42.7 weeks (p=0.0006). Patients lived longer if post-operative treatment was given, in all grades (p<0.0001). Nineteen patients (25.6%) died within 42 days after surgery. Only 60% of them initiated radiotherapy and 10% of them did not complete it. However, tumour grade, radiotherapy and temozolomide- based chemotherapy were independently associated with longer survival in multivariate analysis (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Almost one third of HGG patients can undergo only a biopsy and not debulking surgery. Although radiotherapy improves survival, only 50% of them complete the treatment. An individualised approach to these patients is needed to facilitate a correct analysis of therapy results. New therapies must be investigated in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158984     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-007-0142-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  25 in total

1.  Effect of the extent of surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas.

Authors:  M Ammirati; N Vick; Y L Liao; I Ciric; M Mikhael
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Influence of bromodeoxyuridine radiosensitization on malignant glioma patient survival: a retrospective comparison of survival data from the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (RTOG) for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

Authors:  M D Prados; C B Scott; M Rotman; P Rubin; K Murray; W Sause; S Asbell; R Comis; W Curran; J Nelson; R L Davis; V A Levin; K Lamborn; T L Phillips
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Biopsy versus resection for malignant glioma.

Authors:  S E Metcalfe; R Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

4.  Imaging patterns of multifocal gliomas.

Authors:  A P Kyritsis; V A Levin; W K Yung; N E Leeds
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere.

Authors:  G E Keles; B Anderson; M S Berger
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1999-10

6.  Selection of eligible patients with supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme for gross total resection.

Authors:  J Shinoda; N Sakai; S Murase; H Yano; T Matsuhisa; T Funakoshi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a review of natural history and management options.

Authors:  Lewis C Hou; Anand Veeravagu; Andrew R Hsu; Victor C K Tse
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 8.  The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system.

Authors:  Paul Kleihues; David N Louis; Bernd W Scheithauer; Lucy B Rorke; Guido Reifenberger; Peter C Burger; Webster K Cavenee
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  Treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and poor performance status: is it worthwhile?

Authors:  F L Ampil; A Nanda; B K Willis; S Apple
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

10.  Influence of extent of surgery and tumor location on treatment outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with combined modality approach.

Authors:  B Jeremic; D Grujicic; V Antunovic; L Djuric; M Stojanovic; Y Shibamoto
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma: changing expectations?

Authors:  Leoncio Arribas Alpuente; Antonio Menéndez López; Ricardo Yayá Tur
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Tumour and serum MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Carmen Balańa; Cristina Carrato; José Luis Ramírez; Andrés Felipe Cardona; Mireia Berdiel; José Javier Sánchez; Miquel Tarón; Cristina Hostalot; Eva Musulen; Aurelio Ariza; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Efficacy of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for newly diagnosed and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

Authors:  John F de Groot; Albert H Kim; Sujit Prabhu; Ganesh Rao; Adrian W Laxton; Peter E Fecci; Barbara J O'Brien; Andrew Sloan; Veronica Chiang; Stephen B Tatter; Alireza M Mohammadi; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Roy E Strowd; Clark Chen; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Mustafa Khasraw; David Sun; David Piccioni; Kaylyn D Sinicrope; Jian L Campian; Sylvia C Kurz; Brian Williams; Kris Smith; Zulma Tovar-Spinoza; Eric C Leuthardt
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Sunitinib administered prior to radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable glioblastoma: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Carmen Balaña; Miguel J Gil; Pedro Perez; Gaspar Reynes; Oscar Gallego; Teresa Ribalta; Jaume Capellades; Sofia Gonzalez; Eugenia Verger
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  The butterfly effect on glioblastoma: is volumetric extent of resection more effective than biopsy for these tumors?

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Ana Maria Lemos; Aaron Gokaslan; Eibar Ernesto Cabrera-Aldana; Ahmed Ashary; Alessandro Olivi; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Autoantibody Profiling of Glioma Serum Samples to Identify Biomarkers Using Human Proteome Arrays.

Authors:  Parvez Syed; Shabarni Gupta; Saket Choudhary; Narendra Goud Pandala; Apurva Atak; Annie Richharia; Manubhai K P; Heng Zhu; Sridhar Epari; Santosh B Noronha; Aliasgar Moiyadi; Sanjeeva Srivastava
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Defining the impact of adjuvant treatment on the prognosis of patients with inoperable glioblastoma undergoing biopsy only: does the survival benefit outweigh the treatment effort?

Authors:  Ronja Löber-Handwerker; Katja Döring; Christoph Bock; Veit Rohde; Vesna Malinova
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Surgery vs. Biopsy in the Treatment of Butterfly Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shreya Chawla; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Alessandro Boaro; Rasika Korde; Sofia Amaral Medeiros; Heba Edrees; Elisabetta Mezzalira; Francesco Sala; Rania A Mekary; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.