Literature DB >> 18158763

Molecular imaging and personalized medicine: an uncertain future.

Adrian D Nunn1.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration has described their view of the role that imaging will play in the approval, and perhaps postapproval, use of new therapeutic drugs. The therapeutic drug industry and regulatory authorities have turned to imaging to help them achieve better efficiency and efficacy. We must extend this initiative by demonstrating that molecular imaging can also improve the efficiency and efficacy of routine treatment with these same drugs. The role of molecular imaging in personalized medicine, using targeted drugs in oncology, is very attractive because of the regional information that it provides (in many cases, with a functional or dynamic component), which cannot be provided by in vitro methods ("regional proteomics"). There is great potential for molecular imaging to play a major role in selecting appropriate patients and providing early proof of response, which is critical to addressing the conflict between the high price of treatment and limited reimbursement budgets. This is a new venture in both molecular imaging and targeted drugs. However, there are various regulatory, financial, and practical barriers that must be overcome to achieve this aim, in addition to the normal scientific challenges of drug discovery. There is an urgent need to reduce the cost (i.e., time and money) of developing imaging agents for routine clinical use. The mismatch between the current regulations and personalized medicine includes molecular imaging and requires the engagement of the regulatory authorities to correct. Therapeutic companies must be engaged early in the development of new targeted drugs and molecular imaging agents to improve the fit between the two drug types. Clinical trials must be performed to generate data that not only shows the efficacy of imaging plus therapy in a medical sense, but also in a financial sense. Molecular imaging must be accepted as not just good science but also as central to routine patient management in the personalized medicine of the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158763     DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2007.0417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm        ISSN: 1084-9785            Impact factor:   3.099


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescent-Guided Surgical Resection of Glioma with Targeted Molecular Imaging Agents: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sonya E L Craig; James Wright; Andrew E Sloan; Susann M Brady-Kalnay
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 2.  The evolution of imaging in cancer: current state and future challenges.

Authors:  Luke J Higgins; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Tactics for preclinical validation of receptor-binding radiotracers.

Authors:  Susan Z Lever; Kuo-Hsien Fan; John R Lever
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  Radioimmunoimaging with longer-lived positron-emitting radionuclides: potentials and challenges.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.774

5.  Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29

6.  Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-03-13

7.  CEST theranostics: label-free MR imaging of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Yuguo Li; Hanwei Chen; Jiadi Xu; Nirbhay N Yadav; Kannie W Y Chan; Liangping Luo; Michael T McMahon; Bert Vogelstein; Peter C M van Zijl; Shibin Zhou; Guanshu Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 8.  Perspective review of what is needed for molecular-specific fluorescence-guided surgery.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Eben L Rosenthal; Samuel Achilefu; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.