Literature DB >> 18158607

Genioplasty and chin augmentation with Medpore implants: a report of 650 cases.

Lai Gui1, Luping Huang, Zhiyong Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genioplasty is an old and useful technique. Chin augmentation with Medpore has become popular in recent years. The authors briefly examine their experience with the two techniques.
METHODS: From 2000 to date, 500 genioplasties and 150 chin augmentations with Medpore have been performed. The versatility and benefits of the two techniques are discussed.
RESULTS: Most of the patients achieved satisfactory results with few complications. Genioplasty is recommended for severe developmental or complicated retrogenia and for deviated chin. Both techniques can be used for mild to modest retrogenia. Medpore is especially useful for patients who need a meticulous revision of the chin shape or contour.
CONCLUSIONS: Chin shape and contour are as important as the chin position. Although genioplasty has the widest range of indications, chin augmentation with Medpore has the advantage of minimal risk for some patients who need to change the chin shape or contour. Medpore is totally different from other alloplastic chin implants such as silicone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18158607     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  5 in total

1.  Osteotomy and osteosynthesis in complex segmental genioplasty with double surgical guide.

Authors:  Adriano Assis; Sergio Olate; Luciana Asprino; Márcio de Moraes
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

2.  Profile changes after conventional and chin shield genioplasty.

Authors:  Stuti Singh; Divya Mehrotra; S Mohammad
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  Medpore versus osseous augmentation in genioplasty procedure: A comparison.

Authors:  Shadab Mohammad; Chandra Dhar Dwivedi; R K Singh; Vibha Singh; U S Pal
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01

4.  High-Density Polyethylene Material versus Autogenous Grafts in Craniofacial Augmentation Procedures.

Authors:  Kshitij Agarwal; Rajesh B Dhirawani; Sauvik Singha; Anshalika Agrawal
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun

5.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.