Dear Editor,We read the article by Kothari,1 with great interest. The author has
described the clinical characteristics of spontaneous, late-onset
comitant acute nonaccommodative esotropia in children. We
appreciate that the author has drawn attention to this relatively
uncommon clinical entity. We would like to put forward a
different view regarding neuroimaging in such cases.Many intracranial lesions present with comitant
nonaccommodative esotropia without neurological deficit
in early stage.2 Sometimes acute-onset nonaccommodative
esotropia is the only presenting sign of intracranial neoplasm.
There are many studies in the literature which state that
intracranial lesions may present with acute-onset comitant
esotropia without any neurological deficit or other signs. 2-4In patients with acute esotropia with corpus callosum
gliomas, clinical signs are absent in the early part of the disease.
Also, tumors involving the corpus callosum give rise to no
distinctive signs.3 Posterior fossa lesions are typically known
to present with only acute-onset comitant esotropia with no
other systemic signs such as papilledema.2Acute comitant esotropia has also been described in patients
with Arnold Chiari malformation even prior to onset of typical
down beating nystagmus.4 It is important in these cases of
acquired esotropia to rule out the possibility of intracranial
tumor, Arnold Chiari malformation or other neurological
abnormalities.Although most children with this form of esotropia are
otherwise healthy, central nervous system lesions must be
considred.5Missing a brain tumor, however rare, in a child presenting
with acquired comitant nonaccommodative esotropia will
be an act of negligence. So we feel that neuroimaging should
be done in any patient presenting with acquired comitant
nonaccommodative esotropia.