Literature DB >> 18157963

Anatomic correlates of a normal perfusion scan using 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography.

Jacob M van Werkhoven1, Joanne D Schuijf, J Wouter Jukema, Lucia J Kroft, Marcel P M Stokkel, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, Gabija Pundziute, Arthur J H A Scholte, Ernst E van der Wall, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

Both myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) are currently used to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). However, MSCT permits early detection of atherosclerosis while myocardial perfusion is still normal. In addition, MPI results can be normal despite the presence of high-risk CAD (left main and balanced 3-vessel CAD). In this study, the range of anatomic findings using MSCT in patients with normal MPI results was evaluated. In 180 patients presenting with chest pain, MPI (with gated single-photon emission computed tomography) and 64-slice MSCT were performed. In patients with normal MPI results, prevalences of completely normal coronary arteries, nonobstructive CAD, and obstructive CAD were determined using MSCT. The occurrence of high-risk CAD, including left main and 3-vessel disease, was also evaluated. Normal MPI and adequate MSCT findings were obtained in 97 patients (54%; 50% women; average age 58 +/- 12 years; 5% with known CAD). A total of 38 patients (39%) showed normal coronary anatomy, whereas nonsignificant and significant CAD were observed in 37 (38%) and 18 patients (19%), respectively. Importantly, only 4 patients (4%) presented with high-risk CAD using 64-slice MSCT, 2 with left main and 2 with 3-vessel disease. In conclusion, a normal MPI result can be associated with a wide range of anatomic observations and cannot exclude the presence of both nonobstructive and obstructive CAD. However, importantly, the prevalence of high-risk CAD was rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18157963     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  27 in total

1.  Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by PET/CT; can inactive, active and mixed plaques be discerned?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; A van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Rabbit models: ideal for imaging purposes?

Authors:  A van der Laarse; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Aortic and coronary atherosclerosis: a natural association?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Arnoud van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Monitoring plaque composition: is it worthwile?

Authors:  Arnoud van der Laarse; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Dual source computed tomography: automated, visual or dual analysis?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Non-significant left main disease; truly non-significant?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Single injection, double acquisition: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Yves G America; Arthur J Scholte; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Coronary artery calcium screening: sufficient evidence for accurate risk assessment?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Value of multidetector computed tomography evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the assessment of ischemic heart disease: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Nadjia Kachenoura; Joseph A Lodato; Tamar Gaspar; Dianna M E Bardo; Barbara Newby; Sarah Gips; Nathan Peled; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a "real-world" experience.

Authors:  E Maffei; A Palumbo; C Martini; A Cuttone; F Ugo; E Emiliano; A Menozzi; L Vignali; V Brambilla; P Coruzzi; A Weustink; N Mollet; D Ardissino; C Reverberi; G Crisi; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.