BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cystic neuroendocrine tumors (CNETs) are rare premalignant conditions. Computed tomography (CT) occasionally demonstrates the hypervascular border characteristic of NETs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration and immunocytology may be a more consistent means to establish the diagnosis, but no data on the role of EUS are available. This report represents the largest series of CNETs treated to date, documents the role of EUS in preoperative diagnosis, and describes current management. METHODS: Retrospective review of our experience with CNETs treated at an academic center between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with CNETs were identified. One had symptoms consistent with a functional tumor; the others were nonfunctional. Twelve were detected by CT; only three had peripheral hypervascularity. Nine were studied with preoperative EUS/immunocytology; each of these demonstrated strong staining for chromogranin and synaptophysin. All were resected: four by pancreaticoduodenectomy, one by total pancreatectomy, and one by enucleation. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 39%. Perioperative mortality was 0%. Average follow-up was 3.3 + 0.5 years. One patient had late hepatic recurrence and ultimately died of disease. Two developed recurrent NET in the context of MEN I and required additional surgery. Twelve are alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided immunocytology with staining for neuroendocrine markers is an accurate method to establish the diagnosis of CNET preoperatively. Short- and long-term outcomes after resection are excellent.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cystic neuroendocrine tumors (CNETs) are rare premalignant conditions. Computed tomography (CT) occasionally demonstrates the hypervascular border characteristic of NETs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration and immunocytology may be a more consistent means to establish the diagnosis, but no data on the role of EUS are available. This report represents the largest series of CNETs treated to date, documents the role of EUS in preoperative diagnosis, and describes current management. METHODS: Retrospective review of our experience with CNETs treated at an academic center between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with CNETs were identified. One had symptoms consistent with a functional tumor; the others were nonfunctional. Twelve were detected by CT; only three had peripheral hypervascularity. Nine were studied with preoperative EUS/immunocytology; each of these demonstrated strong staining for chromogranin and synaptophysin. All were resected: four by pancreaticoduodenectomy, one by total pancreatectomy, and one by enucleation. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 39%. Perioperative mortality was 0%. Average follow-up was 3.3 + 0.5 years. One patient had late hepatic recurrence and ultimately died of disease. Two developed recurrent NET in the context of MEN I and required additional surgery. Twelve are alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided immunocytology with staining for neuroendocrine markers is an accurate method to establish the diagnosis of CNET preoperatively. Short- and long-term outcomes after resection are excellent.
Authors: Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Kurtis A Campbell; David Chang; Taylor S Riall; Joann Coleman; Patricia K Sauter; Marcia Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; L Koniaris; S Kaushal; R A Abrams; P K Sauter; J Coleman; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Steven A Ahrendt; Richard A Komorowski; Michael J Demeure; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Chi Leung Liu; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; See Ching Chan; Wai Kuen Tso; Irene O Ng; John Wong Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kristine S Spinelli; Travis E Fromwiller; Roger A Daniel; James M Kiely; Attila Nakeeb; Richard A Komorowski; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rosalie A Carr; Michele T Yip-Schneider; Scott Dolejs; Bradley A Hancock; Huangbing Wu; Milan Radovich; C Max Schmidt Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Satomi Kawamoto; Pamela T Johnson; Chanjuan Shi; Aatur D Singhi; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Elliot K Fishman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Miguel F Herrera; Göran Åkerström; Peter Angelos; Clive S Grant; Ana O Hoff; Juan Pablo Pantoja; Rocio Pérez-Johnston; Dushyant V Sahani; Richard J Wong; Gregory Randolph Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Susan C Pitt; Henry A Pitt; Marshall S Baker; Kathleen Christians; John G Touzios; James M Kiely; Sharon M Weber; Stuart D Wilson; Thomas J Howard; Mark S Talamonti; Layton F Rikkers Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: John K Ramage; A Ahmed; J Ardill; N Bax; D J Breen; M E Caplin; P Corrie; J Davar; A H Davies; V Lewington; T Meyer; J Newell-Price; G Poston; N Reed; A Rockall; W Steward; R V Thakker; C Toubanakis; J Valle; C Verbeke; A B Grossman Journal: Gut Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Alexander R Ende; Alireza Sedarat; Pari Shah; Nirag Jhala; Douglas L Fraker; Jeffrey A Drebin; David C Metz; Michael L Kochman Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.628