BACKGROUND: Major lung resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been proven to be both safe and technically feasible, but is not routinely performed in most hospitals. The aim of this paper is to show our technique for VATS lobectomy and our experience and outcomes obtained. METHODS: We have performed a retrospective review included all patients undergoing major pulmonary resection by VATS at the General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville (Spain) since 1992. The clinical records of all patients were drawn from the hospital archive and data for the following variables were recorded for analysis: age, sex, clinical diagnosis, clinical status, date of surgery, type of surgery, inoperability, conversion to conventional surgery and reasons, duration of surgery and intraoperative complications, postoperative and long-term complications, postoperative stay, diagnosis, definitive status, and mortality. We also describe our surgical technique for each lobectomy. RESULTS: A total of 237 major pulmonary resections were performed, on 203 males and 34 males, with a mean age of 61.43 years (non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: 204, benign processes: 24, carcinoid tumors: 4, and lobectomy due to metastases: 5). The overall conversion rate was 14.01%. Mean duration of lobectomy was 153 min, with a median of 98 min, and mean postoperative stay was 4.2 days. The morbidity rate was 15.18%, mostly involving minor complications. Perioperative mortality was 3.7%. The actuarial 5-year survival rate was 77.7%. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy is a viable safe procedure that meets oncological criteria for lung cancer surgery. In our experience, VATS is currently to be considered ideally indicated for certain benign processes and for T1-T2 N0 M0 bronchogenic carcinomas.
BACKGROUND: Major lung resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been proven to be both safe and technically feasible, but is not routinely performed in most hospitals. The aim of this paper is to show our technique for VATS lobectomy and our experience and outcomes obtained. METHODS: We have performed a retrospective review included all patients undergoing major pulmonary resection by VATS at the General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville (Spain) since 1992. The clinical records of all patients were drawn from the hospital archive and data for the following variables were recorded for analysis: age, sex, clinical diagnosis, clinical status, date of surgery, type of surgery, inoperability, conversion to conventional surgery and reasons, duration of surgery and intraoperative complications, postoperative and long-term complications, postoperative stay, diagnosis, definitive status, and mortality. We also describe our surgical technique for each lobectomy. RESULTS: A total of 237 major pulmonary resections were performed, on 203 males and 34 males, with a mean age of 61.43 years (non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: 204, benign processes: 24, carcinoid tumors: 4, and lobectomy due to metastases: 5). The overall conversion rate was 14.01%. Mean duration of lobectomy was 153 min, with a median of 98 min, and mean postoperative stay was 4.2 days. The morbidity rate was 15.18%, mostly involving minor complications. Perioperative mortality was 3.7%. The actuarial 5-year survival rate was 77.7%. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy is a viable safe procedure that meets oncological criteria for lung cancer surgery. In our experience, VATS is currently to be considered ideally indicated for certain benign processes and for T1-T2 N0 M0 bronchogenic carcinomas.
Authors: Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; K Robert Shen; Mark S Allen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 7.616