Literature DB >> 18157198

The new International Health Regulations: a revolutionary change in global health security.

Michael G Baker1, Andrew M Forsyth.   

Abstract

The International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR 2005) came into force in June 2007. These revised Regulations contain many important changes compared with the previous agreement that they replaced (IHR 1969). This revision was driven by concerns about increasing global health threats and the need to respond with more effective surveillance and control practices. The IHR 2005 agreement: greatly expands the range of events which states must notify to the World Health Organization (WHO) and to which the Regulations apply; introduces a new class of event, the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) which is defined based on modern risk assessment principles; recognises a wide range of surveillance sources that WHO may use; requires states to establish National IHR Focal Points which are responsible for communication with WHO and for the collation and dissemination of information within each state; introduces processes for WHO to investigate, assess, and declare PHEIC; introduces mechanisms for WHO to formally recommend health measures; requires WHO to seek external advice regarding operation of the IHR; obliges states to develop core capacities for surveillance, response, and points of entry; applies human rights principles; updates provisions for borders, travellers, and conveyances; and specifies situations where international collaboration should occur. With collective national and international effort to implement these new Regulations, the IHR 2005 will support greater global health security for all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18157198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  7 in total

Review 1.  Global health and foreign policy.

Authors:  Harley Feldbaum; Kelley Lee; Joshua Michaud
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Event-based internet biosurveillance: relation to epidemiological observation.

Authors:  Noele P Nelson; Li Yang; Aimee R Reilly; Jessica E Hardin; David M Hartley
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-18

3.  Landscape of international event-based biosurveillance.

Authors:  Dm Hartley; Np Nelson; R Walters; R Arthur; R Yangarber; L Madoff; Jp Linge; A Mawudeku; N Collier; Js Brownstein; G Thinus; N Lightfoot
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2010-02-19

4.  Co-benefits and 'no regrets' benefits of influenza pandemic planning.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Philippa Howden-Chapman; Michael G Baker
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Significance of a neglected tropical disease: lessons from a paradigmatic case of 'success in translation'.

Authors:  Carlos M Morel
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) has Declared Twice in 2014; Polio and Ebola at the Top.

Authors:  Mohammed A Soghaier; Khwaja M I Saeed; Khushhal K Zaman
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2015-06-05

7.  PADI-web 3.0: A new framework for extracting and disseminating fine-grained information from the news for animal disease surveillance.

Authors:  Sarah Valentin; Elena Arsevska; Julien Rabatel; Sylvain Falala; Alizé Mercier; Renaud Lancelot; Mathieu Roche
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2021-12-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.