Literature DB >> 18156588

Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: psychological distance and decision making.

Emily Pronin1, Christopher Y Olivola, Kathleen A Kennedy.   

Abstract

Four experiments showed that the decisions people make for future selves and other people are similar to each other and different from their decisions for present selves. Experiments involved decisions to drink a disgusting liquid for scientific purposes (Experiment 1), tutor peers during exam week (Experiment 2), receive e-mails for charity (Experiment 3), and defer a lottery prize for a larger one (Experiment 4). These findings seemed to be at least partially rooted in the tendency for decisions regarding the ongoing, present self to be uniquely influenced by internal subjective experience. Specifically, these effects emerged for real, but not hypothetical, decisions. Also, they were mitigated by manipulations that altered participants' attention to present or future subjective experience. In addition, when participants' subjective experience primarily involved empathy for others (Experiment 3), their decisions on behalf of present selves were more generous than their decisions for future selves and others. Applications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18156588     DOI: 10.1177/0146167207310023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  34 in total

1.  INCREASING SAVING BEHAVIOR THROUGH AGE-PROGRESSED RENDERINGS OF THE FUTURE SELF.

Authors:  Hal E Hershfield; Daniel G Goldstein; William F Sharpe; Jesse Fox; Leo Yeykelis; Laura L Carstensen; Jeremy N Bailenson
Journal:  J Mark Res       Date:  2011-11

2.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

Authors:  Yaacov Trope; Nira Liberman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Psychological distance reduces the effect of internalized stigma on mental health treatment decisions.

Authors:  Colleen Hughes; Kentaro Fujita; Anne C Krendl
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  You owe it to yourself: boosting retirement saving with a responsibility-based appeal.

Authors:  Christopher J Bryan; Hal E Hershfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-11-21

Review 5.  The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Dylan D Wagner; James V Haxby; Todd F Heatherton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-07

6.  Can self-prediction overcome barriers to Hepatitis B vaccination? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony D Cox; Dena Cox; Rosalie Cyrier; Yolanda Graham-Dotson; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Ajay Nadig; Storm Heidinger; Keegan Walden; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Don't stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving.

Authors:  Hal Ersner-Hershfield; M Tess Garton; Kacey Ballard; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2009-06-01

9.  Saving for the future self: neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting.

Authors:  Hal Ersner-Hershfield; G Elliott Wimmer; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Theory of Mind experience sampling in typical adults.

Authors:  Lauren Bryant; Anna Coffey; Daniel J Povinelli; John R Pruett
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.