Literature DB >> 18156522

Informed consent in Ghana: what do participants really understand?

Z Hill1, C Tawiah-Agyemang, S Odei-Danso, B Kirkwood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore how subjects in a placebo-controlled vitamin A supplementation trial among Ghanaian women aged 15-45 years perceive the trial and whether they know that not all trial capsules are the same, and to identify factors associated with this knowledge.
METHODS: 60 semistructured interviews and 12 focus groups were conducted to explore subjects' perceptions of the trial. Steps were taken to address areas of low comprehension, including retraining fieldworkers. 1971 trial subjects were randomly selected for a survey measuring their knowledge that not all trial capsules are the same. The subjects' fieldworkers were also interviewed about their characteristics and trial knowledge. Factors associated with knowledge were explored using multi-level modeling.
RESULTS: Although subjects knew they were taking part in research, most thought they were receiving an active and beneficial medication. Variables associated with knowledge were education and district of residence. Radio broadcasts benefited those with some schooling. Fieldworkers' characteristics were not associated with subjects' knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: Research and debate on new or improved consent procedures are urgently required, particularly for subjects with little education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18156522     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  25 in total

Review 1.  Ethics and electronic health information technology: challenges for evidence-based medicine and the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  I D Norman; M K Aikins; F N Binka
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Kittichet Phiphatpatthamaamphan; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone; Sudsayam Manuwong; Parichat Curry; Sith Siramolpiwat; Thanachai Punchaipornpon; Supakit Kanitnate; Nattapol Tammachote; Rodsarin Yamprasert; Waipoj Chanvimalueng; Ruchirat Kaewkumpai; Soiphet Netanong; Peerapong Kitipawong; Paskorn Sritipsukho; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Evaluation of the Informed Consent Process of a Multicenter Tuberculosis Treatment Trial.

Authors:  Kimberley N Chapman; Eric Pevzner; Joan M Mangan; Peter Breese; Dorcas Lamunu; Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara; Joseph G Nakibali; Stefan V Goldberg
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

6.  Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments.

Authors:  Susan Bull; Bobbie Farsides; Fasil Tekola Ayele
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk.

Authors:  Robin Lee; Samantha Lampert; Lynn Wilder; Anne L Sowell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Comparison of group counseling with individual counseling in the comprehension of informed consent: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Sarkar; Thuppal V Sowmyanarayanan; Prasanna Samuel; Azara S Singh; Anuradha Bose; Jayaprakash Muliyil; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  'What do I know? Should I participate?' Considerations on participation in HIV related research among HIV infected adults in Bangalore, South India.

Authors:  Rashmi J Rodrigues; Jimmy Antony; Shubha Krishnamurthy; Anita Shet; Ayesha De Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ronald Kiguba; Paul Kutyabami; Stephen Kiwuwa; Elly Katabira; Nelson K Sewankambo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.