Literature DB >> 18156106

Methodologic and ethical ramifications of sex and gender differences in public health research.

Kitty Lawrence1, Anita Rieder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experience and investigative studies have shown that inequalities still exist between the sexes as well as in how public health policies and strategies approach the needs of the sexes. Sufficient attention has not been given to gender in public health research. Gender-based differences and similarities need to be promoted, and more structured guidelines are needed to build gender into public health research models.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to investigate and discuss public health research and to answer several related questions on gender biases, ethics and methodologies, and the establishment of guidelines.
METHODS: Using the search terms public health research and gender , or ethics , gender , and public health, a literature search was conducted predominately with, but not limited to, the PubMed database. English- or German-language articles were identified that examined the current status of gender in public health research as well as any relevant ethical guidelines.
RESULTS: A review of the current literature showed that much work has been undertaken to promote the inclusion of gender in health research. However, deficiencies in the extent of gender-oriented research have been found in a number of key areas, including ethics committees and public health research methodology. Women were found to be underrepresented in ethics committees, which lack clear guidance, particularly in the European Union, to ensure the inclusion of gender issues in public health research. Data are often not sex disaggregated, and information on gender and social circumstances are frequently lacking. Furthermore, some methodologies, such as those used in the field of occupational health, underestimate men's or women's burden of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations include establishing guidelines for researchers on how to incorporate gender in health research, ensuring that the composition of ethics committees is more representative of society, and recommending that data collection systems or bodies ensure that data are disaggregated by sex and include socioeconomic aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18156106     DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80050-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gend Med        ISSN: 1550-8579


  7 in total

Review 1.  How to study the impact of sex and gender in medical research: a review of resources.

Authors:  Alyson J McGregor; Memoona Hasnain; Kathryn Sandberg; Mary F Morrison; Michelle Berlin; Justina Trott
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.027

2.  Social determinants of male health: a case study of Leeds, UK.

Authors:  Alan White; Amanda Seims; Ian Cameron; Tim Taylor
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The Sex and Gender Intersection in Chronic Periodontitis.

Authors:  Effie Ioannidou
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Young people's awareness on biobanking and DNA profiling: results of a questionnaire administered to Italian university students.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo; Antonio Fassina; Luciana Caenazzo
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-06-10

5.  Better science with sex and gender: Facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research.

Authors:  Joy L Johnson; Lorraine Greaves; Robin Repta
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-06

6.  Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?

Authors:  Joy Johnson; Zena Sharman; Bilkis Vissandjée; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Depression in relation to sex and gender expression among Swedish septuagenarians-Results from the H70 study.

Authors:  Therese Rydberg Sterner; Pia Gudmundsson; Hanna Falk; Nazib Seidu; Felicia Ahlner; Hanna Wetterberg; Lina Rydén; Robert Sigström; Svante Östling; Anna Zettergren; Silke Kern; Margda Waern; Ingmar Skoog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.