Literature DB >> 18156096

Methodologic ramifications of paying attention to sex and gender differences in clinical research.

Martin H Prins1, Kim M Smits, Luc J Smits.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methodologic standards for studies on sex and gender differences should be developed to improve reporting of studies and facilitate their inclusion in systematic reviews. The essence of these studies lies within the concept of effect modification.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews important methodologic issues in the design and reporting of pharmacogenetic studies.
RESULTS: Differences in effect based on sex or gender should preferably be expressed in absolute terms (risk differences) to facilitate clinical decisions on treatment. Information on the distribution of potential effect modifiers or prognostic factors should be available to prevent a biased comparison of differences in effect between genotypes. Other considerations included the possibility of selective nonavailability of biomaterial and the choice of a statistical model to study effect modification.
CONCLUSION: To ensure high study quality, additional methodologic issues should be taken into account when designing and reporting studies on sex and gender differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18156096     DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80051-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gend Med        ISSN: 1550-8579


  8 in total

1.  Interaction of occupational and personal risk factors in workforce health and safety.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Sudha Pandalai; Victoria Wulsin; HeeKyoung Chun
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Determining If Sex Bias Exists in Human Surgical Clinical Research.

Authors:  Neel A Mansukhani; Dustin Y Yoon; Katherine A Teter; Vanessa C Stubbs; Irene B Helenowski; Teresa K Woodruff; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  How to study the impact of sex and gender in medical research: a review of resources.

Authors:  Alyson J McGregor; Memoona Hasnain; Kathryn Sandberg; Mary F Morrison; Michelle Berlin; Justina Trott
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.027

4.  Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Amédé Gogovor; France Légaré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intra-individual reaction time variability in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: gender, processing load and speed factors.

Authors:  Michelle Phillips; Peter Rogers; Judy Haworth; Antony Bayer; Andrea Tales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Better science with sex and gender: Facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research.

Authors:  Joy L Johnson; Lorraine Greaves; Robin Repta
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-06

Review 7.  Applying the Gender Lens to Risk Factors and Outcome after Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Sandra Eifert; Sonja Guethoff; Ingo Kaczmarek; Andres Beiras-Fernandez; Ute Seeland; Helmut Gulbins; Jörg Seeburger; Oliver Deutsch; Bettina Jungwirth; Elpiniki Katsari; Pascal Dohmen; Bettina Pfannmueller; Rebecka Hultgren; Ina Schade; Karolina Kublickiene; Friedrich W Mohr; Brigitte Gansera
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-04

8.  Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?

Authors:  Joy Johnson; Zena Sharman; Bilkis Vissandjée; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.