Literature DB >> 18155963

Double-blind randomized Phase I study comparing rdESAT-6 to tuberculin as skin test reagent in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection.

Sandra M Arend1, Willeke P J Franken, Henrik Aggerbeck, Corine Prins, Jaap T van Dissel, Birgit Thierry-Carstensen, Pernille Nyholm Tingskov, Karin Weldingh, Peter Andersen.   

Abstract

Limited specificity of the tuberculin skin test incited the development of in vitro assays based on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens such as ESAT-6 that are lacking in Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG). In animal studies, intradermal ESAT-6 was safe and induced specific skin test responses. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of intradermal recombinant dimer ESAT-6 (rdESAT-6) compared with tuberculin and to determine the human dose. The study design was a double-blind Phase I study with intra-subject randomization to the left and right forearm, comparing 2 Tuberculin Units (TU) intradermal tuberculin (RT23) with 0.01, 0.1, 1 or 10 microg rdESAT-6 in groups of five healthy controls or treated tuberculosis (TB) patients. The risk of sensitization after skin testing was assessed in healthy volunteers. All doses were tolerated well by healthy volunteers and responses to rdESAT-6 were limited to transient redness after 24 h only at the highest dose. No sensitization was observed. Because 1 microg rdESAT-6 induced large responses with local side effects in some TB patients, the 10 microg dose of rdESAT-6 was not tested. Mean responses to 0.01, 0.1 and 1 microg rdESAT-6 measured 14.0, 19.8 and 38.8 mm of redness, respectively, and 7.0, 13.4 and 14.6 mm of induration. The response to tuberculin was similar to the responses to 0.1 microg rdESAT-6. Mild local side effects due to tuberculin and rdESAT-6 were observed in 8/15, respectively, 6/15 patients, more pronounced at the highest rdESAT-6 dose. In conclusion, this pilot Phase I study of safety, feasibility and dose finding of intradermal rdESAT-6 provides proof of principle of a specific skin test for human use. No serious adverse events were observed but the study was not sufficiently powered to demonstrate complete safety. Intradermal rdESAT-6 did not seem to sensitize healthy volunteers. In treated TB patients, responses to rdESAT-6 were optimal at 0.1 microg. Further studies are needed to evaluate sensitization after repeated doses and to study the effect of additional CFP-10 on the sensitivity of a TB-specific skin test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18155963     DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2007.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)        ISSN: 1472-9792            Impact factor:   3.131


  15 in total

1.  Development of a skin test for bovine tuberculosis for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals.

Authors:  Adam O Whelan; Derek Clifford; Bhagwati Upadhyay; Eleanor L Breadon; James McNair; Glyn R Hewinson; Martin H Vordermeier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Safety of Recombinant Fusion Protein ESAT6-CFP10 as a Skin Test Reagent for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: an Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Center Phase I Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Feng Li; Miao Xu; Lijun Zhou; Yanqing Xiong; Lu Xia; Xiaoyong Fan; Jun Gu; Jiang Pu; Shuihua Lu; Guozhi Wang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2016-09-06

Review 3.  Latent tuberculosis in children: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Meenu Singh; Arushi Gahlot Saini; Nidhi Anil; Amit Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Purified protein derivatives of tuberculin--past, present, and future.

Authors:  Hongliang Yang; Nicole A Kruh-Garcia; Karen M Dobos
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-01

5.  First-in-man open clinical trial of a combined rdESAT-6 and rCFP-10 tuberculosis specific skin test reagent.

Authors:  Winnie Bergstedt; Pernille N Tingskov; Birgit Thierry-Carstensen; Søren T Hoff; Henrik Aggerbeck; Vibeke O Thomsen; Peter Andersen; Aase B Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  New diagnostic methods for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Melissa R Nyendak; Deborah A Lewinsohn; David M Lewinsohn
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.915

7.  Assessment of a protein cocktail-based skin test for bovine tuberculosis in a double-blind field test in cattle.

Authors:  Ting Xin; Hong Jia; Jiabo Ding; Pingjun Li; Hongjun Yang; Shaohua Hou; Weifeng Yuan; Xiaoyu Guo; Haichun Wang; Qianqian Liang; Ming Li; Bin Wang; Hongfei Zhu
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-01-30

8.  Use of recombinant purified protein derivative (PPD) antigens as specific skin test for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Henriette Stavri; Nadia Bucurenci; Irina Ulea; Adriana Costache; Loredana Popa; Mircea Ioan Popa
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Randomised clinical trial investigating the specificity of a novel skin test (C-Tb) for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection.

Authors:  Henrik Aggerbeck; Rafaela Giemza; Paulatsya Joshi; Pernille N Tingskov; Søren T Hoff; Julia Boyle; Peter Andersen; David J M Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Proteomic analysis of purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Thottethodi Subrahmanya Keshava Prasad; Renu Verma; Satish Kumar; Raja Sekhar Nirujogi; Gajanan J Sathe; Anil K Madugundu; Jyoti Sharma; Vinuth N Puttamallesh; Anjali Ganjiwale; Vithal P Myneedu; Aditi Chatterjee; Akhilesh Pandey; Hc Harsha; Jayasuryan Narayana
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.