Literature DB >> 18155873

Durability of surgery for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.

Gert J de Borst1, Pieter Zanen, Jean-Paul P de Vries, Erik D van de Pavoordt, Rob G Ackerstaff, Frans L Moll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of carotid surgery for the management of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is challenged by carotid artery stenting (CAS). We reviewed redo CEA in a consecutive series of patients to determine the safety, durability, and long-term benefit associated with repeat surgical treatment for restenosis.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 73 redo procedures in 72 patients (57% men) with a mean age 66 years (range, 49-81 years) was analyzed. The mean interval between prior CEA and redo CEA was 53 months (range, 8-192 months). Operative indications included symptomatic restenosis in 28 patients (38%). A patch angioplasty was performed in 62 patients (85%). The main outcome measures included perioperative and late stroke and death, and the development of secondary restenosis.
RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. During a mean follow-up of 52 months (range, 12-144 months), the Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival was 85% at 5 years. At 5 years, the cumulative rate of freedom from all strokes was 98%, and the freedom from ipsilateral stroke was 100%. After secondary procedures, re-recurrent stenosis > or =50% occurred in 10 patients (13.7%). The cumulative freedom from re-restenosis (> or =50%) was 85% at 5 years. Five patients (7%) received tertiary carotid reconstructions.
CONCLUSION: Repeat CEA for recurrent stenosis can be performed safely with excellent long-term protection from stroke. These data provide a standard against which the results of CAS can be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18155873     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  Risks Associated With Primary and Redo Carotid Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era.

Authors:  Isibor J. Arhuidese; Muhammad Faateh; Besma J. Nejim; Satinderjit Locham; Christopher J. Abularrage; Mahmoud B. Malas
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rodney P Bensley; Ruby C Lo; Allan D Hamden; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in patients undergoing reintervention after prior carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Gert Jan de Borst; Brian W Nolan; Ruby C Lo; Robert A Cambria; Richard J Powell; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Anatomical and Technical Factors Influence the Rate of In-Stent Restenosis following Carotid Artery Stenting for the Treatment of Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Stenosis.

Authors:  Marine Gaudry; Jean-Michel Bartoli; Laurence Bal; Roch Giorgi; Mariangela De Masi; Pierre-Edouard Magnan; Philippe Piquet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.