Literature DB >> 18155430

Prolongation of the period between biopsy and EMR can influence the nonlifting sign in endoscopically resectable colorectal cancers.

Kyung Su Han1, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dong Hyun Choi, Chang Won Hong, Hee Jin Chang, Seok-Byung Lim, Hyo Seong Choi, Seung-Yong Jeong, Jae-Gahb Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nonlifting sign is widely used for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal tumors, and it is commonly accepted that EMR is contraindicated for colorectal tumors with a nonlifting sign because of the probability of massive submucosal invasion.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinicopathologic factors that affect the nonlifting sign in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma (SICC).
DESIGN: Details regarding a history of biopsy, postbiopsy days, tumor location, tumor configuration, tumor size, depth of submucosal invasion, histologic type, adenomatous remnants, and angiolymphatic invasion were studied in relation to the nonlifting sign.
SETTING: National Cancer Center, Korea. PATIENTS: The study involved 76 patients with SICC treated by endoscopic or surgical resection, in whom the tumor was examined for the nonlifting sign from 2001 to 2006.
RESULTS: The nonlifting sign was observed in 15 cases (19.7%). A deep submucosal invasion, a history of biopsy, and the absence of adenomatous remnants were identified as factors affecting the nonlifting sign in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < .05). An increase in the number of postbiopsy days was associated with the nonlifting sign in endoscopically resectable SICC, and all 11 sm1 cancer cases with fewer than 21 postbiopsy days showed lifting.
CONCLUSIONS: A history of biopsy and the absence of adenomatous remnants, in addition to deep submucosal invasion, were found to influence the nonlifting sign in SICC. It may be best that mechanical stimulation such as forceps biopsies are minimized before EMR, and EMR should be tried as soon as possible if biopsy was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18155430     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Predictors for underestimated pathology in forceps biopsy compared with resection specimen of colorectal neoplasia; focus on surface appearance.

Authors:  Yu Jin Hah; Eun Soo Kim; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang; Ilseon Hwang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Y Backes; A Moss; J B Reitsma; P D Siersema; L M G Moons
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors 7-16 mm in diameter.

Authors:  Xianfei Wang; Li Xiang; Aimin Li; Zelong Han; Yue Li; Yadong Wang; Yubin Guo; Kangmin Zuang; Qun Yan; Jietao Zhong; Jing Xiong; Haiyun Yang; Side Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The Feasibility of Performing Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Without Previous Experience in Performing Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Yang; Gwi Hong Jeong; Yerim Song; Sang Hyoung Park; Soo-Kyung Park; Jong Wook Kim; Kee Wook Jung; Kyung-Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Young Soo Park; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

8.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Colorectal lateral spreading tumor subtypes: clinicopathology and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Mei-Dong Xu; Xiao-Yun Wang; Quan-Lin Li; Ping-Hong Zhou; Yi-Qun Zhang; Yun-Shi Zhong; Wei-Feng Chen; Li-Li Ma; Wen-Zheng Qin; Jian-Wei Hu; Li-Qing Yao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in elderly people.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Kyoko Sakai; Yoshio Sumida; Kazuyuki Kanemasa; Ken Inoue; Yasutaka Morimoto; Hideyuki Konishi; Naoki Wakabayashi; Satoshi Kokura; Nobuaki Yagi; Akio Yanagisawa; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.