Literature DB >> 18155204

Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.

B Joseph Elmunzer1, Peter D R Higgins, Yong M Kwon, Christopher Golembeski, Joel K Greenson, Sheryl J Korsnes, Grace H Elta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surveillance colonoscopy, an increased number of biopsy specimens correlates with a higher dysplasia detection rate. Larger biopsy specimens may also increase the diagnostic yield.
OBJECTIVE: To compare a new jumbo forceps with a standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate IBD surveillance biopsy specimens.
DESIGN: Prospective single-center study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients who were undergoing an IBD surveillance colonoscopy were enrolled. As part of standard IBD surveillance, 8 paired biopsy specimens were obtained from the rectosigmoid by using the jumbo forceps and a standard large-capacity forceps. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Biopsy specimens were deemed adequate if they met all 3 of the following criteria: (1) length > or =3 mm, (2) penetration into the muscularis mucosa, and (3) < 20% crush artifact.
RESULTS: The proportion of adequate biopsy specimens obtained with the jumbo forceps was significantly higher than that obtained with the large-capacity control forceps (67% vs 48%, P < .0001). The average length of the biopsy specimen obtained with the jumbo forceps was 4.00 mm (95% CI, 3.81-4.20 mm) compared with 3.19 mm (95% CI, 2.99-3.38 mm) with the large-capacity (control) forceps. LIMITATIONS: (1) No validated outcome measurement for the quality of GI biopsy specimens exists and (2) in this study, interobserver variability between pathologists was high.
CONCLUSIONS: The jumbo forceps was superior to a standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate IBD surveillance biopsy specimens. Because biopsy specimens obtained with the jumbo forceps were larger, the use of this forceps for IBD surveillance will allow the endoscopist to sample a larger colonic mucosal surface area, potentially resulting in an increased dysplasia detection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18155204     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  17 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of 3 different-sized biopsy forceps for quality of sampling in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Susana Gonzalez; Woojin M Yu; Michael S Smith; Kristen N Slack; Heidrun Rotterdam; Julian A Abrams; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Surveillance for colitis-associated colon neoplasia.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Current management of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark C Mattar; Denver Lough; Michael J Pishvaian; Aline Charabaty
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03

4.  Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.

Authors:  Daniel A Sussman; Amar R Deshpande; Uday Shankar; Jodie A Barkin; Ana Maria Medina; Robert J Poppiti; Luigi X Cubeddu; Jamie S Barkin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  A randomized trial to determine the diagnostic accuracy of conventional vs. jumbo forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial neoplasias before endoscopic submucosal dissection; open-label study.

Authors:  Hyo Keun Jeon; Ho Yoel Ryu; Mee Yon Cho; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jae Woo Kim; Hong Jun Park; Moon Young Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Sang Ok Kwon; Su Yeon Park; Sung Ho Won
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shireena Desai; Samir Gupta; Nedret Copur-Dahi; Mary L Krinsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps.

Authors:  Bulent Yasar; Huseyin Kayadibi; Evren Abut; Dilek Benek; Koray Kochan; Can Gonen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry is reliable in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma regardless of treatment status and shows high intratumoral homogeneity.

Authors:  Jacob R Bledsoe; Michal Kamionek; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  More advanced or aggressive colorectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of "high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia" on biopsy-based pathological examination.

Authors:  X B Wei; X H Gao; H Wang; C G Fu; W Q Zheng; J M Zheng; W Zhang; L J Liu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jan Martinek; Jana Maluskova; Magdalena Stefanova; Inna Tuckova; Stepan Suchanek; Zuzana Vackova; Jana Krajciova; Marek Kollar; Miroslav Zavoral; Julius Spicak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.