BACKGROUND: The rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and the amygdala consistently emerge from neuroimaging studies as brain regions crucially involved in normal and abnormal fear processing. To date, however, the role of the rACC specifically during the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning still remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate a possible top-down control of a specific rACC sub-region over amygdala activation during pavlovian fear acquisition. METHODS: We performed excitotoxic lesions, temporal inactivation, and activation of a specific sub-region of the rACC that we identified by tracing studies as supporting most of the connectivity with the basolateral amygdala (r(Amy)-ACC). The effects of these manipulations over amygdala function were investigated with a classical tone-shock associative fear conditioning paradigm in the rat. RESULTS: Excitotoxic lesions and transient inactivation of the r(Amy)-ACC pre-training selectively produced deficits in the acquisition of the tone-shock associative learning (but not context). This effect was specific for the acquisition phase. However, the deficit was found to be transient and could be overcome by overtraining. Conversely, pre-training transient activation of the r(Amy)-ACC facilitated associative learning and increased fear expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a subregion of the rACC is key to gating the efficiency of amygdala-dependent auditory fear conditioning learning. Because r(Amy)-ACC inputs were confirmed to be glutamatergic, we propose that recruitment of this brain area might modulate overall basolateral amygdala excitatory tone during conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus concomitant processing. In the light of clinical research, our results provide new insight on the effect of inappropriate rACC recruitment during emotional events.
BACKGROUND: The rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and the amygdala consistently emerge from neuroimaging studies as brain regions crucially involved in normal and abnormal fear processing. To date, however, the role of the rACC specifically during the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning still remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate a possible top-down control of a specific rACC sub-region over amygdala activation during pavlovian fear acquisition. METHODS: We performed excitotoxic lesions, temporal inactivation, and activation of a specific sub-region of the rACC that we identified by tracing studies as supporting most of the connectivity with the basolateral amygdala (r(Amy)-ACC). The effects of these manipulations over amygdala function were investigated with a classical tone-shock associative fear conditioning paradigm in the rat. RESULTS:Excitotoxic lesions and transient inactivation of the r(Amy)-ACC pre-training selectively produced deficits in the acquisition of the tone-shock associative learning (but not context). This effect was specific for the acquisition phase. However, the deficit was found to be transient and could be overcome by overtraining. Conversely, pre-training transient activation of the r(Amy)-ACC facilitated associative learning and increased fear expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a subregion of the rACC is key to gating the efficiency of amygdala-dependent auditory fear conditioning learning. Because r(Amy)-ACC inputs were confirmed to be glutamatergic, we propose that recruitment of this brain area might modulate overall basolateral amygdala excitatory tone during conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus concomitant processing. In the light of clinical research, our results provide new insight on the effect of inappropriate rACC recruitment during emotional events.
Authors: Ahmad R Hariri; Venkata S Mattay; Alessandro Tessitore; Francesco Fera; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hiroto Kawasaki; Ralph Adolphs; Hiroyuki Oya; Christopher Kovach; Hanna Damasio; Olaf Kaufman; Matthew Howard Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: G Bush; J A Frazier; S L Rauch; L J Seidman; P J Whalen; M A Jenike; B R Rosen; J Biederman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1999-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephen A Allsop; Romy Wichmann; Fergil Mills; Anthony Burgos-Robles; Chia-Jung Chang; Ada C Felix-Ortiz; Alienor Vienne; Anna Beyeler; Ehsan M Izadmehr; Gordon Glober; Meghan I Cum; Johanna Stergiadou; Kavitha K Anandalingam; Kathryn Farris; Praneeth Namburi; Christopher A Leppla; Javier C Weddington; Edward H Nieh; Anne C Smith; Demba Ba; Emery N Brown; Kay M Tye Journal: Cell Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Michelle Lee; Toby R Manders; Sarah E Eberle; Chen Su; James D'amour; Runtao Yang; Hau Yueh Lin; Karl Deisseroth; Robert C Froemke; Jing Wang Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Heather E Acuff; Amelia Versace; Michele A Bertocci; Cecile D Ladouceur; Lindsay C Hanford; Anna Manelis; Kelly Monk; Lisa Bonar; Alicia McCaffrey; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Dara Sakolsky; David Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 21.596