BACKGROUND: Soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) is a potential marker for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which may be useful for screening high-risk asbestos-exposed individuals. METHODS: We evaluated SMRP in serum from MPM patients (n = 90), lung cancer patients (n = 170), age and tobacco-matched asbestos-exposed individuals (n = 66), and in MPM pleural effusions (n = 45), benign effusions (n = 30), and non-MPM effusions (n = 20) using the MesoMark enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define true and false positive rates at various cutoffs. RESULTS: Mean serum SMRP levels were higher in MPM compared with lung cancer (5.67 +/- 0.82 nM [mean +/- standard error of the mean vs 1.99 +/- 0.43 nM, p < 0.001), and stage I MPM SMRP levels (n = 12; 2.09 +/- 0.41 nM) were significantly higher than those in asbestos-exposed individuals (0.99 +/- 0.09 nM, p = 0.02, respectively). Stage 2 to 4 SMRP serum levels were significantly higher than those for stage 1 MPM. The area under the ROC curve for serum SMRP was 0.81 for differentiating MPM and asbestos-exposed individuals; cutoff = 1.9 nM (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 89%). The MPM pleural effusion SMRP was significantly higher than benign or other non-MPM pleural effusions (65.57 +/- 11.33 nM vs 27.46 +/- 11.25 nM [p = 0.003] and 18.99 +/- 7.48 nM [p = 0.044], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data support SMRP as a promising marker for MPM in both serum and pleural effusion fluid, and justify prospective screening studies of SMRP in combination with other markers for screening of asbestos-exposed cohorts.
BACKGROUND:Soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) is a potential marker for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which may be useful for screening high-risk asbestos-exposed individuals. METHODS: We evaluated SMRP in serum from MPM patients (n = 90), lung cancerpatients (n = 170), age and tobacco-matched asbestos-exposed individuals (n = 66), and in MPM pleural effusions (n = 45), benign effusions (n = 30), and non-MPM effusions (n = 20) using the MesoMark enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define true and false positive rates at various cutoffs. RESULTS: Mean serum SMRP levels were higher in MPM compared with lung cancer (5.67 +/- 0.82 nM [mean +/- standard error of the mean vs 1.99 +/- 0.43 nM, p < 0.001), and stage I MPM SMRP levels (n = 12; 2.09 +/- 0.41 nM) were significantly higher than those in asbestos-exposed individuals (0.99 +/- 0.09 nM, p = 0.02, respectively). Stage 2 to 4 SMRP serum levels were significantly higher than those for stage 1 MPM. The area under the ROC curve for serum SMRP was 0.81 for differentiating MPM and asbestos-exposed individuals; cutoff = 1.9 nM (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 89%). The MPM pleural effusionSMRP was significantly higher than benign or other non-MPM pleural effusions (65.57 +/- 11.33 nM vs 27.46 +/- 11.25 nM [p = 0.003] and 18.99 +/- 7.48 nM [p = 0.044], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data support SMRP as a promising marker for MPM in both serum and pleural effusion fluid, and justify prospective screening studies of SMRP in combination with other markers for screening of asbestos-exposed cohorts.
Authors: Clementina Mesaros; Andrew J Worth; Nathaniel W Snyder; Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou; Anil Vachani; Steven M Albelda; Ian A Blair Journal: Bioanalysis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Elliot L Servais; Christos Colovos; Luis Rodriguez; Adam J Bograd; Jun-ichi Nitadori; Camelia Sima; Valerie W Rusch; Michel Sadelain; Prasad S Adusumilli Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nico van Zandwijk; Christopher Clarke; Douglas Henderson; A William Musk; Kwun Fong; Anna Nowak; Robert Loneragan; Brian McCaughan; Michael Boyer; Malcolm Feigen; David Currow; Penelope Schofield; Beth Ivimey Nick Pavlakis; Jocelyn McLean; Henry Marshall; Steven Leong; Victoria Keena; Andrew Penman Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Rosa Filiberti; Paola Marroni; Manlio Mencoboni; Virginia Mortara; Pietro Caruso; Alex Cioè; Luigi Michelazzi; Domenico F Merlo; Andrea Bruzzone; Barbara Bobbio; Lisette Del Corso; Roberto Galli; Paola Taveggia; Guglielmo Dini; Fabio Spigno Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-01-01 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Michael K Felten; Khaled Khatab; Lars Knoll; Thomas Schettgen; Hendrik Müller-Berndorff; Thomas Kraus Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Rosa Filiberti; Stefano Parodi; Roberta Libener; Giovanni Paolo Ivaldi; Pier Aldo Canessa; Donatella Ugolini; Barbara Bobbio; Paola Marroni Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.064