Literature DB >> 18154782

Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting with drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.

Jeong Hoon Yang1, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Soo Jin Cho, Joo Yong Hahn, Jin-Ho Choi, Seung Hyuk Choi, Young Tak Lee, Sang Hoon Lee, Kyung Pyo Hong, Jeong Euy Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has demonstrated superiority over the bare metal stent in reducing the incidence of restenosis. We investigated the clinical outcomes of DESs versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a series of patients with multivessel disease.
METHODS: Patients with multivessel disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs (n = 441) or CABG (n = 390) between March 2003 and March 2005 were included. The primary outcomes of this study were defined as the absence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 12 months, including death from any cause, cerebrovascular accidents, acute myocardial infarctions, and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs or CABG.
RESULTS: During 12 months of follow-up, the mortality rate was also not significantly different between the two groups (2.1% versus 3.2%, p = 0.170). The incidences of composite death, cerebrovascular accident, and acute myocardial infarction were not significantly different between groups (2.8% versus 3.9%, p = 0.180). The rate of overall major adverse cardiac and cerebral events was higher in DES group compared with the CABG group (13.0% versus 4.2%, p < 0.001), as driven by the higher incidence of myocardial infarction and revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidences of death and cerebrovascular event were not significantly different between the DES and CABG groups in the patients with multivessel disease. However, the overall incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events seems to be favorable for CABG group even this era of DESs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18154782     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

Review 1.  The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.

Authors:  Stephen A May; James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

2.  Complete versus incomplete revascularization for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era.

Authors:  Young Bin Song; Sang-Yeub Lee; Joo-Yong Hahn; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Kyung Pyo Hong; Jeong Euy Park; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: Current state of evidence.

Authors:  Mukesh Singh; Rohit Arora; Vamsi Kodumuri; Sandeep Khosla; Evyan Jawad
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan M Colazo; Brian C Evans; Angel F Farinas; Salam Al-Kassis; Craig L Duvall; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Optimal treatment of multivessel complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Haihui Sun; Lianqun Cui
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Concomitant multi-vessel disease is associated with a lower procedural death rate in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions within the left main coronary artery (from the ORPKI registry).

Authors:  Rafał Januszek; Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Tomasz Kameczura; Tomasz Tokarek; Dariusz Dudek; Stanisław Bartuś
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization Strategies for Patients With MVD/LMCA Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Kan Fan; Ya-Min Su; Xing-Xing Cai; Zhou-Shan Gu; Hai-Hua Geng; Hai-Yan Pan; Jian-Hua Zhu; Min Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.