| Literature DB >> 18154639 |
Antonello A Romani1, Pellegrino Crafa, Silvia Desenzani, Gallia Graiani, Costanza Lagrasta, Mario Sianesi, Paolo Soliani, Angelo F Borghetti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The heat shock proteins (HSPs) 27-kDa (HSP27) and 72-kDa (HSP72), are ubiquitous chaperone molecules inducible in cells exposed to different stress conditions. Increased level of HSPs are reported in several human cancers, and found to be associated with the resistance to some anticancer treatments and poor prognosis. However, there is no study of the relationship between HSPs expression and patient's prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA). In this exploratory retrospective study, we investigated the expressions of HSP27 and HSP72 as potential prognostic factors in IHCCA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18154639 PMCID: PMC2245949 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinical-pathological features of patients affected by IHCCA who underwent surgery
| Total patients (N = 31) | |
| 67.7 ± 7 yrs | |
| Male | 11 |
| Female | 20 |
| <4 cm | 8 |
| 4–6 cm | 9 |
| >6 cm | 10 |
| Well/Moderate | 20 |
| Poor | 8 |
| <50% | 9 |
| >50% | 22 |
| Infiltrated | 12 |
| Pushed | 18 |
| Absent | 18 |
| Present | 10 |
| I | 6 |
| II | 5 |
| III | 17 |
1Estimated by pathologist; #data were not available for some patients.
Figure 1Immunoperoxidase staining. Serial paraffin-embedded tissue sections of IHCCA show HSP27 and HSP72 expression in cholangiocarcinoma cells (brown staining). Left panels, 100× magnification; right panels, 200× magnification.
Figure 2HSP27 expression versus tumor parameters. Box-and-whisker plots of HSP27 expression versus percentage of pHH3-positive cells (A), and of HSP27 versus tumor greatest dimension (B). The open squares represent those outlier patients outside the 95% confidence interval. The black solid circles represent the mean values, while the line inside the box represents the median. Bar-chart plots of HSP27 expression versus frequency of vascular (C) and capsular (D) invasion.
Figure 3pHH3 cutpoint versus tumor progression parameters. Bar-chart plots of pHH3 below/above cutpoint versus frequency of vascular (A) and capsular (C) invasion. Box-and-whisker plots of pHH3 cutpoint versus tumor greatest dimension (B). The black solid circles represent the mean values, while the line inside the box represents the median.
Figure 4HSP72 expression versus necrosis and lymphoid infiltration. Bar-chart plots of HSP72 expression versus frequency of necrosis (A) and lymphoid infiltration (C).
Figure 5Non parametric estimates of survival for HSP27 expression. This figure shows the estimated survival probabilities based on the survival data of patients with presence or absence of HSP27 expression in their tumor samples.
Cox univariate analysis
| Age | 1.03 | 0.97 – 1.1 | 0.33 |
| Gender | 0.68 | 0.21 – 2.22 | 0.52 |
| Tumor Border Growth(1) | 3 | 0.85 – 10.6 | 0.088 |
| Multiple nodules | 0.923 | 0.31 – 2.75 | 0.89 |
| 1.08 – 9.33 | |||
| 1.20 – 12.9 | |||
| Resected margins invasion | 1.79 | 0.55 – 5.82 | 0.33 |
| Tumor mass(2) | 1.30 | 0.95 – 1.79 | 0.100 |
| Number of resected segments | 0.914 | 0.68 – 1.23 | 0.55 |
| 3.83 – 89.6 | |||
| HSP72 | 1.99 | 0.66 – 5.94 | 0.22 |
| 1.46 – 122.6 |
In bold are highlighted those variables with P-value < 0.05. (1)Microscopic tumor border growth; (2)Tumor greatest dimension; (3)Coded as Early Stage (Stage I-II) or Late Stage (Stage III-IV).