Literature DB >> 1815407

Managed-care plans. Their future under national health insurance.

T P Weil1.   

Abstract

The nation's health maintenance organizations, preferred-provider organizations, independent practice associations, and similar managed-care efforts are not well positioned to take a leadership role in a nationwide universal access or national health insurance plan. They--with the possible exception of some large staff and group health maintenance organizations--have been unable to show uniformly that they can contain costs, provide better access or higher quality of care, and achieve greater patient satisfaction than fee-for-service endeavors. As the United States pursues universal access as a step toward national health insurance, the managed-care plans will continue to increase their numbers of subscribers. They will not, however, be able to enroll large numbers of the young, low-income employees and their dependents who account for most of the 63 million people uninsured sometime during each year. Under national health insurance, there might be an option for some health maintenance organizations to negotiate capitated payments. The vast majority of the nation's physicians, however, will reluctantly embrace a centrally managed fee-for-service approach rather than a salary or capitated reimbursement method, leaving only a trace of the competitive managed-care plan theme in a future, primarily monolithic, national health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1815407      PMCID: PMC1003082     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  30 in total

1.  A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy (1).

Authors:  A Enthoven; R Kronick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The competitive effects of health maintenance organizations: another look at the evidence from Hawaii, Rochester, and Minneapolis/St. Paul.

Authors:  H S Luft; S C Maerki; J B Trauner
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Medicare's two systems for paying providers.

Authors:  L F Rossiter; K Langwell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Controlling health expenditures--the Canadian reality.

Authors:  R G Evans; J Lomas; M L Barer; R J Labelle; C Fooks; G L Stoddart; G M Anderson; D Feeny; A Gafni; G W Torrance
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  It is time for universal access, not universal insurance.

Authors:  J S Todd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  PPOs: the employer perspective.

Authors:  T Rice; J Gabel; G de Lissovoy
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.265

7.  A national health program: northern light at the end of the tunnel.

Authors:  S Woolhandler; D U Himmelstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Lessons learned from Medicaid managed care approaches.

Authors:  M D Anderson; P D Fox
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  State health risk pools: insuring the 'uninsurable'.

Authors:  S S Laudicina
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Patient selection in a competitive health care system.

Authors:  H S Luft; R H Miller
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.