Literature DB >> 1812649

Differential leukocyte count: manual or automated, what should it be?

B H Hyun1, G L Gulati, J K Ashton.   

Abstract

Today's automated hematology analyzers capable of performing a full CBC and a differential leukocyte count (DLC) on whole blood, particularly in a closed tube system, using cytochemistry or impedance-based flow cytometry technology coupled with laser light scattering, conductivity and/or differential cell lysis, are here to stay. Their need and popularity among at least the large, cost and quality-conscious clinical laboratories have been growing for the past few years and will continue to do so in the years ahead. The efficiency and reliability of several of these analyzers in performing complete CBCD (CBC and DLC) and in flagging significant abnormalities have been tested and found acceptable with the need to review a stained blood smear or perform a manual DLC to confirm or obtain additional information on selected cases.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1812649     DOI: 10.3349/ymj.1991.32.4.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  2 in total

1.  Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?

Authors:  Samuel Ricardo Comar; Mariester Malvezzi; Ricardo Pasquini
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2014-04-03

2.  Evaluation of criteria of manual blood smear review following automated complete blood counts in a large university hospital.

Authors:  Samuel Ricardo Comar; Mariester Malvezzi; Ricardo Pasquini
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2017-07-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.