Literature DB >> 1812237

Effect of task on the degree of synchronization of intrinsic hand muscle motor units in man.

F D Bremner1, J R Baker, J A Stephens.   

Abstract

1. Recordings were made of the firing of pairs of intrinsic hand muscle motor units active under different task conditions in man. The different tasks were defined as isometric contractions producing force in one of three different directions: finger abduction, finger extension, or finger flexion. The degree of motor-unit synchronization associated with each of these task conditions was compared with the use of cross-correlation analysis. 2. The average amount of synchronization between the firing of motor units recorded from within first dorsal interosseous muscle (IDI) was greater during index finger extension than during index finger abduction (n = 8 motor-unit pairings, 3 subjects). In addition, for another sample population of motor units, the average amount of synchronization was greater during index finger abduction than during index finger flexion (n = 11 motor-unit pairings, 4 subjects). 3. In a further series of experiments, one motor unit of each pair was recorded from second dorsal interosseous muscle (2DI), whereas the other motor unit of each pair was recorded from 1DI. The average amount of synchronization for these motor-unit pairings was greater during extension of the index and middle fingers than during abduction of the index and middle fingers (n = 8, 4 subjects). For another sample population of such motor-unit pairings, the average amount of synchronization was found to be greater during abduction of the index and middle fingers than during flexion of the index and middle fingers (n = 11, 4 subjects). 4. In approximately one-third of cases, it was not found possible to maintain the same firing rates from two motor units in 1DI when active under different task conditions. For instance, the "reference" motor unit might consistently fire at a faster rate than the "response" motor unit when active during index finger extension but consistently fire at a slower rate than the response motor unit when active during index finger abduction. Where such motor-unit pairs have been studied in detail, the pattern of task dependence in their synchronization was found to be similar to that described above for motor-unit pairs in which the firing rates remained constant under the different task conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1812237     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.6.2072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  The unilateral and bilateral control of motor unit pairs in the first dorsal interosseous and paraspinal muscles in man.

Authors:  J F Marsden; S F Farmer; D M Halliday; J R Rosenberg; P Brown
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Common modulation of motor unit pairs during slow wrist movement in man.

Authors:  N Kakuda; M Nagaoka; J Wessberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Single motor unit activity in relation to pulsatile motor output in human finger movements.

Authors:  J Wessberg; N Kakuda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A novel algorithm to remove electrical cross-talk between surface EMG recordings and its application to the measurement of short-term synchronisation in humans.

Authors:  J M Kilner; S N Baker; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modulation of synchrony between single motor units during precision grip tasks in humans.

Authors:  J M Kilner; M Alonso-Alonso; R Fisher; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Extraction of individual muscle mechanical action from endpoint force.

Authors:  Jason J Kutch; Arthur D Kuo; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Common synaptic input to the human hypoglossal motor nucleus.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; E Fiona Bailey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Role of across-muscle motor unit synchrony for the coordination of forces.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Motor unit synchronization measured by cross-correlation is not influenced by short-term strength training of a hand muscle.

Authors:  Dawson J Kidgell; Martin V Sale; John G Semmler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  How computational technique and spike train properties affect coherence detection.

Authors:  K Terry; L Griffin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.