Literature DB >> 1810543

Allograft aortic valve replacement: long-term comparative clinical analysis of the viable cryopreserved and antibiotic 4 degrees C stored valves.

M F O'Brien1, D C McGiffin, E G Stafford, M A Gardner, P F Pohlner, G J McLachlan, K Gall, S Smith, E Murphy.   

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures was performed using an allograft aortic valve in 534 patients. From December 1969 to May 1975 (group I), a 4 degrees C stored valve was used (124 patients) and from June 1975 to July 1990 (group II), a cryopreserved valve (410 patients) was used. The 30-day mortality was 8.9% (confidence limits [CL] 6.2%-12.3%) for group I and 2.7% (CL 1.9%-3.8%) for group II. Actuarial patient survival including early hospital mortality at 14 years was 57% for group I and 71% for group II (p = 0.014). Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism for all patients (n = 534) was 94% at 14 years, and for patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass graft (n = 457) was 97% at 14 years (p = 0.017). Actuarial freedom from allograft valve endocarditis at 14 years was 92% in group I and 94% in group II (p = 0.36). The actuarial freedom from moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence at 14 years was 50% (group I) and 78% (group II) (p = 0.27). Reoperation was undertaken for endocarditis, leaflet structural deterioration (SD), or technical reasons. The actuarial freedom from reoperation (all causes) at 14 years was 63% (group I) and 86% (group II) (p = 0.39). Reoperation for SD occurred in 34 patients in group I and three patients in group II. The actuarial freedom from reoperation for SD at 14 years was 67% (group I) and 95% (group II) (p = 0.001). To reflect a more accurate depiction of the prevalence of SD, patients were analyzed according to the development of "assumed structural deterioration" (at reoperation, at death with moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence and macroscopic valve deterioration on autopsy, and in the presence of moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence in patients not undergoing reoperation). The actuarial freedom from "assumed structural deterioration" at 14 years was 51% (group I) and 85% (group II) (p = 0.000003). The long-term results confirm the low incidence of thromboembolism and endocarditis regardless of the method of preservation and demonstrate the overall acceptable performance of the viable cryopreserved allograft valve and its superiority over the 4 degrees C stored valve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1810543     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.1991.6.4s.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  12 in total

1.  Ventricular outflow tract reconstructions with cryopreserved cardiac valve homografts. A single surgeon's 10-year experience.

Authors:  R A Hopkins; A Reyes; D A Imperato; G A Carpenter; J L Myers; K A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Management of annuloaortic ectasia in association with aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  M Rammohan; U Milind; T Karuna; A S Kumar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

3.  Effect of storage temperature on cell viability in cryopreserved canine aortic, pulmonic, mitral, and tricuspid valve homografts.

Authors:  I Kashima; R Yozu; H Shin; T Yamada; J Hata; S Kawada
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-04

Review 4.  What is the proper place of the Ross procedure in our modern armamentarium?

Authors:  Duke E Cameron; Luca A Vricella
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Decellularized Cryopreserved Allografts as Off-the-Shelf Allogeneic Alternative for Heart Valve Replacement: In Vitro Assessment Before Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Laura Iop; Adolfo Paolin; Paola Aguiari; Diletta Trojan; Elisa Cogliati; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Pseudoaneurysm following aortic homograft: clinical implications?

Authors:  E Oechslin; T Carrel; M Ritter; C Attenhofer; L von Segesser; W Kiowski; M Turina; R Jenni
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-12

7.  Audit of homograft valve bank.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Choudhary; Nikhil Bansal; Indeever Kumar; Rajashekhar Palletti; Milind Hote; Sachin Talwar; Devagourou Velaoudham; Sanjeev Lalwani
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

8.  Acute regeneration and chronic acellular transformation of rabbit cryopreserved aortic allografts.

Authors:  Akitoshi Yamada; Rei Takahashi; Reiko Toyama; Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Acta Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Xenograft Failure of Pulmonary Valved Conduit Cross-linked with Glutaraldehyde or Not Cross-linked in a Pig to Goat Implantation Model.

Authors:  Dong Jin Kim; Yong Jin Kim; Woong-Han Kim; Soo-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-09

10.  International heart valve bank survey: a review of processing practices and activity outcomes.

Authors:  Wee Ling Heng; Helmi Albrecht; Paul Chiappini; Yeong Phang Lim; Linda Manning
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.