Literature DB >> 1810358

A double-blind, randomised comparison of fluvoxamine with dothiepin in the treatment of depression in elderly patients.

M K Rahman1, M J Akhtar, N C Savla, R R Sharma, J M Kellett, J J Ashford.   

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine were compared with the tricyclic dothiepin in 52 elderly (age greater than 64 years) hospital patients in a multi-centre double-blind randomised trial. Patients met DSM-III criteria for 'major depressive episode' and scored greater than 29 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after a one-week placebo baseline. Active treatment was for six weeks. The dosage of both drugs was 50 mg nocte for three days, 100 mg nocte for the remainder of the first week, thereafter increasing to a maximum of 200 mg/day according to response/tolerance. MADRS scores improved by 63.5% with fluvoxamine and 60.0% with dothiepin; there were no significant differences between treatments at any assessment. Nausea, dizziness, headache, somnolence and constipation in both groups, plus dry mouth and asthenia in the dothiepin group were more frequent than single reports. Two patients in each group discontinued treatment owing to unwanted effects. There were no clinically significant changes in haematological, biochemical or cardiovascular parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1810358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pract        ISSN: 0007-0947


  10 in total

1.  New antidepressants for old people?

Authors:  M G Livingston; H M Livingston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-19

Review 2.  Use of antidepressants in late-life depression.

Authors:  Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Cynthia Lokker; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older patients. A tolerability perspective.

Authors:  U Skerritt; R Evans; S A Montgomery
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I M Anderson; B M Tomenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

Review 5.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for late-life depression: a comparative review.

Authors:  L K Solai; B H Mulsant; B G Pollock
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Ichiro M Omori; Norio Watanabe; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 7.  Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in depressive illness.

Authors:  M I Wilde; G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  F Song; N Freemantle; T A Sheldon; A House; P Watson; A Long; J Mason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

Review 9.  Comparative tolerability profiles of the newer versus older antidepressants.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; H K Manji; W Z Potter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  How well do elderly patients with major depressive disorder respond to antidepressants: a systematic review and single-group meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katharina Gutsmiedl; Marc Krause; Irene Bighelli; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.