Literature DB >> 18096932

Evaluation of a lameness scoring system for dairy cows.

P T Thomsen1, L Munksgaard, F A Tøgersen.   

Abstract

Lameness is a major problem in dairy production both in terms of reduced production and compromised animal welfare. A 5-point lameness scoring system was developed based on previously published systems, but optimized for use under field conditions. The scoring system included the words "in most cases" in the descriptions of the clinical signs evaluated. This was done to avoid a situation in which cows might not fit into any of the categories. Additionally, a number of clinical signs used in other lameness scoring systems, considered of less importance in relation to lameness, were not included. Only clinical signs were included that could easily be assessed within a few seconds from a distance. The scoring system was evaluated with intra-and interobserver agreement using kappa statistics. The evaluation was done before and after training 5 observers. Weighted kappa values ranged from 0.38 to 0.78 for intraobserver agreement, with mean kappa values across all observers of 0.60 and 0.53 before and after training, respectively. Weighted kappa values ranged from 0.24 to 0.68 for interobserver agreement, with mean kappa values across all pairs of observers of 0.48 and 0.52 before and after training, respectively. Training had only a limited positive effect on intra- and interobserver agreement. Additionally, how the different lameness categories are distributed along a theoretical scale representing the full spectrum of lameness from "absolutely normal gait" to "as lame as a cow can possibly be" was evaluated. This evaluation was done using the polychoric correlation coefficient. The estimated within-observer polychoric correlation coefficient ranged from 0.76 to 0.96, and there were no significant differences between the thresholds used to classify cows into different lameness categories by different observers before or after training. In conclusion, the results suggest that the lameness categories were not equidistant and the scoring system has reasonable reliability in terms of intra- and interobserver agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18096932     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  21 in total

1.  Distribution analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms related to feet and legs and their association with lameness in Vrindavani cattle.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Gyanendra Kumar Gaur; Pruthviraj D R; Nihar Ranjan Sahoo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Evaluating observer agreement of scoring systems for foot integrity and footrot lesions in sheep.

Authors:  Alessandro Foddai; Laura E Green; Sam A Mason; Jasmeet Kaler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Reliability of an injury scoring system for horses.

Authors:  Cecilie M Mejdell; Grete H M Jørgensen; Therese Rehn; Kjersti Fremstad; Linda Keeling; Knut E Bøe
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 4.  The Role of Infrared Thermography as a Non-Invasive Tool for the Detection of Lameness in Cattle.

Authors:  Maher Alsaaod; Allan L Schaefer; Wolfgang Büscher; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 1. How to Distinguish between Non-Lame and Lame Cows Based on Differences in Locomotion or Behavior.

Authors:  Annelies Van Nuffel; Ingrid Zwertvaegher; Liesbet Pluym; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Vivi M Thorup; Matti Pastell; Bart Sonck; Wouter Saeys
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Kinematic gait characteristics of straight line walk in clinically sound dairy cows.

Authors:  M Tijssen; F M Serra Braganςa; K Ask; M Rhodin; P H Andersen; E Telezhenko; C Bergsten; M Nielen; E Hernlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Handheld mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in dairy cows - intra-individual variation, inter-observer agreement and variation over time.

Authors:  Peter M Raundal; Pia H Andersen; Nils Toft; Björn Forkman; Lene Munksgaard; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Use of Extended Characteristics of Locomotion and Feeding Behavior for Automated Identification of Lame Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Gian Beer; Maher Alsaaod; Alexander Starke; Gertraud Schuepbach-Regula; Hendrik Müller; Philipp Kohler; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The motivation-based calving facility: Social and cognitive factors influence isolation seeking behaviour of Holstein dairy cows at calving.

Authors:  Maria Vilain Rørvang; Mette S Herskin; Margit Bak Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.