Literature DB >> 18096730

Detection of bladder tumors with 3-dimensional sonography and virtual sonographic cystoscopy.

Ercan Kocakoc1, Adem Kiris, Irfan Orhan, A Kursad Poyraz, Hakan Artas, Fatih Firdolas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bladder tumors are among the most common types of malignant neoplasms of the urinary tract. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential value of 3-dimensional (3D) sonography and sonographic cystoscopy in detection of bladder tumors.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with suspected or known bladder tumors were included this study. All patients underwent 3D sonography and conventional cystoscopy within 15 days. The number, size, location, and morphologic features of the lesions were evaluated on gray scale, 3D virtual, and multiplanar reconstruction images obtained from the patients. The results of 3D sonographic cystoscopy were compared with the findings from conventional cystoscopy, which was considered the reference standard.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight (90.3%) of 31 3D virtual sonographic cystoscopic studies had good or excellent image quality. Conventional cystoscopy revealed 47 lesions in 22 of 28 patients; 3D sonographic virtual cystoscopy showed 41 (87.2%) of 47 lesions. Three-dimensional virtual sonography alone had sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 70.6%, a positive predictive value of 93.9%, and a negative predictive value of 80% for tumor detection. The combination of gray scale sonography, multiplanar reconstruction, and 3D virtual sonography had sensitivity of 96.4%, specificity of 88.8%, a positive predictive value of 97.6%, and a negative predictive value of 84.2% for tumor detection.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional sonography is a promising alternative noninvasive technique for use in detection of bladder tumors, their localization, and perivesical spreading. The location, size, and morphologic features of the tumors shown on 3D sonography agreed well with the findings of conventional cystoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18096730     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  8 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Volume US of the urinary tract in pediatric patients-a pilot study.

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Aparna Joshi; Swati Mody; J Michael Zerin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05-13

3.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  C Nicolau; L Bunesch; L Peri; R Salvador; J M Corral; C Mallofre; C Sebastia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prospective evaluation of interobserver diagnostic agreement for focal urinary bladder wall abnormalities detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  G Francica; F Scarano; S A Bellini; A Miragliuolo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-12-03

Review 5.  Imaging in Localized Bladder Cancer: Can Current Diagnostic Modalities Provide Accurate Local Tumor Staging?

Authors:  Sandeep Gurram; Akhil Muthigi; Jillian Egan; Lambros Stamatakis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Does 3D Ultrasound Enhance the Diagnosis of Bladder Tumours in Patients with Haematuria?

Authors:  Miguel Silva-Ramos; Nuno Louro; Rui Versos; Victor Cavadas; Filinto Marcelo
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-03-07

Review 7.  What's new in urologic ultrasound?

Authors:  Anupam Lal; Priyanka Naranje; Santhosh Kumar Pavunesan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Imaging of Bladder Cancer: Standard Applications and Future Trends.

Authors:  Rasha Taha Abouelkheir; Abdalla Abdelhamid; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar; Tarek El-Diasty
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.