Literature DB >> 18096474

Influence of different implantation techniques on long-term survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: an echocardiographic study.

Jing Ping Sun1, Jianli Niu, Michael K Banbury, Lingmei Zhou, David O Taylor, Randall C Starling, Mario J Garcia, William J Stewart, James D Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) was initially done by the biatrial technique, although the bicaval technique has recently become more popular. The aim of this study was to compare OHT outcomes when using the bicaval technique vs the biatrial technique.
METHODS: A total of 615 patients were transplanted at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from January 1993 and October 2003 (biatrial technique: n = 293; bicaval technique: n = 322). The average follow-up period was 4.2 +/- 2.9 years (range 1 to 11 years). Patients who were supported with a left ventricular assist device (prior to transplant) and who could not be weaned off respiratory support were excluded.
RESULTS: Patients in both groups were similar with regard to pre-operative characteristics. The peri-operative mortality showed no statistical significant differences between the two groups. The left atrium was significantly more enlarged in the biatrial group. The bicaval group showed a significantly reduced incidence of tricuspid regurgitation. Survival at 10-year follow-up was 87.3% in the bicaval group and 79.9% in the biatrial group (p < 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were significant risk factors for death in both groups. The bicaval technique showed a significantly better mortality outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the bicaval technique for OHT offers a better outcome than the biatrial technique. The significant reduction of left atrial size and atrioventricular valve regurgitation in the bicaval group may have a major impact on the long-term preservation of cardiac function and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096474     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  5 in total

1.  Indications, Complications, and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Results From the Cash Study.

Authors:  Johannes Gökler; Arezu Z Aliabadi-Zuckermann; Alexandra Kaider; Amrut V Ambardekar; Herwig Antretter; Panagiotis Artemiou; Alejandro M Bertolotti; Udo Boeken; Vicens Brossa; Hannah Copeland; Maria Generosa Crespo-Leiro; Andrea Eixeré-Esteve; Eric Epailly; Mina Farag; Michal Hulman; Kiran K Khush; Marco Masetti; Jignesh Patel; Heather J Ross; Igor Rudež; Scott Silvestry; Sofia Martin Suarez; Amanda Vest; Andreas O Zuckermann
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Functional tricuspid valve insufficiency after cardiac transplantation: Which factor is the most important?

Authors:  Vüsal Hajiyev; Michael Dandel; Ruhi Yeter; Felix Schoenrath; Felix Hennig; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-08-03

3.  Commentary: Second verse, same as the first: Biatrial versus bicaval anastomosis in cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  David D Yuh
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-08-28

4.  Tricuspid valve regurgitation after orthotopic heart transplantation: prevalence and etiology.

Authors:  Yaniv Berger; Yedael Har Zahav; Yigal Kassif; Alexander Kogan; Rafael Kuperstein; Dov Freimark; Jacob Lavee
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-10-14

5.  Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Elective Operation or Last Exit Strategy?

Authors:  Johannes Goekler; Andreas Zuckermann; Emilio Osorio; Faris F Brkic; Keziban Uyanik-Uenal; Guenther Laufer; Arezu Aliabadi-Zuckermann
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.