Literature DB >> 18096293

Laboratory-based blood pressure recovery is a predictor of ambulatory blood pressure.

Ranak Trivedi1, Andrew Sherwood, Timothy J Strauman, James A Blumenthal.   

Abstract

The recovery phase of the stress response is an individual difference characteristic that may predict cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to examine whether laboratory-based blood pressure (BP) recovery predicts ambulatory BP (ABP). One hundred and eighty-two participants underwent a standard laboratory stress protocol, involving a 20-min baseline rest period, and four stressors presented in a counterbalanced order, each followed by a 10-min recovery period. Participants also wore an ABP monitor for 24h during a typical workday. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that BP recovery accounted for significant additional variance for daytime SBP (p<0.001), nighttime SBP (p<0.001), daytime DBP (p<0.001), and nighttime DBP (p<0.001), after controlling for baseline and reactivity BP. Results suggest that persistence of the BP response following stress may be a more salient characteristic of the stress response in understanding its potential impact on longer term cardiovascular regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096293      PMCID: PMC2292462          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  48 in total

1.  On the reliable assessment of cardiovascular recovery: an application of curve-fitting techniques.

Authors:  N Christenfeld; L M Glynn; W Gerin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: conceptual and measurement considerations.

Authors:  Thomas W Kamarck; William R Lovallo
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Predicting blood pressure and heart rate change with cardiovascular reactivity and recovery: results from 3-year and 10-year follow up.

Authors:  Janine V Moseley; Wolfgang Linden
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 4.  Left ventricular mass index and diastolic filling. Relation to blood pressure and demographic variables in a healthy biracial sample.

Authors:  A L Hinderliter; K C Light; P W Willis
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Anticipatory and residual effects of an active coping task on pre- and post-stress baselines.

Authors:  W Gerin; C Pieper; T G Pickering
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  The relationship between 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures and laboratory measures of cardiovascular reactivity.

Authors:  P J Cornish; E B Blanchard; J Jaccard
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1994-09

7.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Applying latent growth curve modeling to the investigation of individual differences in cardiovascular recovery from stress.

Authors:  Maria M Llabre; Susan Spitzer; Scott Siegel; Patrice G Saab; Neil Schneiderman
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  The role of rumination in recovery from reactivity: cardiovascular consequences of emotional states.

Authors:  Laura M Glynn; Nicholas Christenfeld; William Gerin
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Blood pressure reactions to acute psychological stress and future blood pressure status: a 10-year follow-up of men in the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  D Carroll; G D Smith; M J Shipley; A Steptoe; E J Brunner; M G Marmot
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Labeling and hypertension: it is time to intervene on its negative consequences.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.