Literature DB >> 18095835

Viro-immunologic response to ritonavir-boosted or unboosted atazanavir in a large cohort of multiply treated patients: the CARe Study.

Maria Mercedes Santoro1, Ada Bertoli, Patrizia Lorenzini, Adriano Lazzarin, Roberto Esposito, Giampiero Carosi, Giovanni Di Perri, Gaetano Filice, Mauro Moroni, Giuliano Rizzardini, Pietro Caramello, Renato Maserati, Pasquale Narciso, Antonietta Cargnel, Andrea Antinori, Carlo Federico Perno.   

Abstract

Currently, comparative data able to define the potency of boosted versus unboosted atazanavir in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients are limited. Specifically, in clinical practice it is very important to establish whether atazanavir-boosting with ritonavir warrants potency and efficacy that overcome the profile of unboosted drug. For this reason, our goal was to evaluate viro-immunologic determinants of response to atazanavir, in unboosted ATV400 or boosted ATV300/r formulation, from baseline to week 48 in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients enrolled in a prospective observational Italian study. Data from 354 patients included in an atazanavir "Early Access Program" (AI424-900) with baseline viremia 500 copies per milliliter or more and with an available virologic follow-up were examined using as-treated analysis. Of these, 200 (56.5%) and 154 (43.5%), respectively, received regimens containing ATV300/r or ATV400. Virologic success (VS) was defined as reaching viremia of less than 500 copies per milliliter during follow-up. Estimated median time to VS was 8 weeks in the ATV300/r group and 13 weeks in the ATV400 group. Proportion of patients achieving VS was higher in the ATV300/r group than in ATV400 group at week 12 (66% versus 47%), as well as at week 48 (86% versus 64%). At multivariate Cox regression, receiving ATV300/r dosing was independently associated with increased probability of achieving VS [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.06]. Conversely, CDC stage C, higher baseline viral load, and more experience with protease inhibitors (PIs) were associated with poorer virologic response. In an unselected population of highly pretreated HIV-infected individuals, receiving atazanavir as part of antiretroviral regimen results in effective virologic response and immunologic recovery. The antiviral efficacy of atazanavir is greater when boosted with low-dose ritonavir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18095835     DOI: 10.1089/apc.2007.0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS        ISSN: 1087-2914            Impact factor:   5.078


  6 in total

1.  Adverse drug interactions: moving from perception to action.

Authors:  Ryan Mayhew; June M McKoy; Thanh Ha Luu; Isaac Lopez; Melissa Frick; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Protease Inhibitors for Patients With HIV-1 Infection: A Comparative Overview.

Authors:  Peter J Hughes; Erika Cretton-Scott; Ami Teague; Terri M Wensel
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-06

3.  Atazanavir/ritonavir-based combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults.

Authors:  Chad J Achenbach; Kristin M Darin; Robert L Murphy; Christine Katlama
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.831

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents.

Authors:  Frantz Foissac; Stéphane Blanche; Catherine Dollfus; Déborah Hirt; Ghislaine Firtion; Corinne Laurent; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Saïk Urien
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of atazanavir-based therapy in HIV-infected infants, children and adolescents: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 1020A.

Authors:  Richard M Rutstein; Pearl Samson; Terry Fenton; Courtney V Fletcher; Jennifer J Kiser; Lynne M Mofenson; Elizabeth Smith; Bobbie Graham; Marina Mathew; Grace Aldrovani
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Two different patterns of mutations are involved in the genotypic resistance score for atazanavir boosted versus unboosted by ritonavir in multiple failing patients.

Authors:  M M Santoro; A Bertoli; P Lorenzini; F Ceccherini-Silberstein; N Gianotti; C Mussini; C Torti; G Di Perri; G Barbarini; T Bini; S Melzi; P Caramello; R Maserati; P Narciso; V Micheli; A Antinori; C F Perno
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.553

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.