Literature DB >> 18094294

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography.

Tae Kyoung Kim1, Hyun-Jung Jang, Peter N Burns, Jessica Murphy-Lavallee, Stephanie R Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the differentiating features of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenoma on contrast-enhanced sonography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent contrast-enhanced sonography and were confirmed to have FNH (n = 43) or hepatic adenoma (n = 19) were assessed retrospectively for arterial phase enhancement, filling direction, stellate arteries, and portal phase enhancement. An algorithm was applied to these interpreted features to determine the contrast-enhanced sonography diagnosis.
RESULTS: All lesions were hypervascular in the arterial phase. Centrifugal filling was more common in FNH (39 and 32 of 43, 91% and 74% [reader 1 and reader 2]) than in adenoma (3 and 3 of 19, 16%). Centripetal or mixed filling was more common in adenoma (16 and 16 of 19, 84%) than in FNH (4 and 11 of 43, 9% and 26%) (p < 0.001, kappa = 0.61). Stellate arteries characterized FNH (29 and 26 of 43, 67% and 60%) but not adenoma (3 and 2 of 19, 16% and 11%) (p < 0.001, kappa = 0.36). Sustained portal phase enhancement was more common in FNH (37 and 39 of 43, 86% and 91%) than in adenoma (9 and 12 of 19, 47% and 63%) (p < 0.02, kappa = 0.79). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of sonography for diagnosing FNH were 95% and 86%, 74% and 79%, 89% and 90%, and 88% and 71%, (reader 1 and reader 2, respectively).
CONCLUSION: FNH is predicted on the basis of arterial phase centrifugal filling and stellate vascularity on contrast-enhanced sonography. Adenoma is less reliably predicted on the basis of centripetal or mixed filling without stellate vascularity. Sustained portal phase enhancement is more common in FNH than in adenoma but contributes less to the differentiation of these lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18094294     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  35 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the liver.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Junji Shiraishi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Kunio Doi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-28

2.  Quantification of Microvascular Tortuosity during Tumor Evolution Using Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Yueh Z Lee; Mike Lee; Emmanuel Cherin; F Stuart Foster; Stephen R Aylward; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Agustin Cristiano; Agustin Dietrich; Juan Carlos Spina; Victoria Ardiles; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

Review 4.  Benign liver lesions: grey-scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances.

Authors:  A E Obaro; S M Ryan
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-12

5.  Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Soussan; Christophe Aubé; Stéphane Bahrami; Jérôme Boursier; Dominique Charles Valla; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Characterisation of focal liver lesions undetermined at grey-scale US: contrast-enhanced US versus 64-row MDCT and MRI with liver-specific contrast agent.

Authors:  T V Bartolotta; A Taibbi; M Midiri; L La Grutta; M De Maria; R Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  A case of focal nodular hyperplasia with a new characteristic finding on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Levovist.

Authors:  Kaoru Onoue; Yukio Miyamoto; Makiko Nishioka; Norio Nakata; Toru Sekiya; Kunihiko Fukuda
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in the pediatric oncologic population: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jamie L Coleman; Fariba Navid; Wayne L Furman; M Beth McCarville
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and characterization of liver tumors.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Jang; Hojun Yu; Tae Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.