Literature DB >> 18093062

The fate of the chemical warfare agent during DNA extraction.

Della A Wilkinson1, Albert G Hulst, Leo P J de Reuver, Simon H van Krimpen, Ben M L van Baar.   

Abstract

Forensic laboratories do not have the infrastructure to process or store contaminated DNA samples that have been recovered from a crime scene contaminated with chemical or biological warfare agents. Previous research has shown that DNA profiles can be recovered from blood exposed to several chemical warfare agents after the agent has been removed. The fate of four toxic agents, sulfur mustard, sodium 2-fluoroacetate, sarin, and diazinon, in a lysis buffer used in Promega DNA IQ extraction protocol was studied to determine if extraction would render the samples safe. Two independent analytical methods were used per agent, selected from GC-MS, 1H NMR, 19F NMR, (31)P NMR, or LC-ES MS. The methods were validated before use. Determinations were carried out in a semi-quantitative way, by direct comparison to standards. Agent levels in the elution buffer were found to be below the detectable limits for mustard, sarin, sodium 2-fluoroacetate or low (<0.02 mg/mL) for diazinon. Therefore, once extracted these DNA samples could be safely processed in a forensic laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18093062     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  2 in total

Review 1.  DNA reviews: DNA identification following CBRN incidents.

Authors:  Eleni Socratous; Eleanor A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.456

2.  Rapid and efficient filtration-based procedure for separation and safe analysis of CBRN mixed samples.

Authors:  Mostafa Bentahir; Frederic Laduron; Leonid Irenge; Jérôme Ambroise; Jean-Luc Gala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.