Literature DB >> 18093044

What risks do people perceive in everyday life? A perspective gained from the experience sampling method (ESM).

Robin M Hogarth1, Mariona Portell, Anna Cuxart.   

Abstract

The experience sampling method (ESM) was used to collect data from 74 part-time students who described and assessed the risks involved in their current activities when interrupted at random moments by text messages. The major categories of perceived risk were short term in nature and involved "loss of time or materials" related to work and "physical damage" (e.g., from transportation). Using techniques of multilevel analysis, we demonstrate effects of gender, emotional state, and types of risk on assessments of risk. Specifically, females do not differ from males in assessing the potential severity of risks but they see these as more likely to occur. Also, participants assessed risks to be lower when in more positive self-reported emotional states. We further demonstrate the potential of ESM by showing that risk assessments associated with current actions exceed those made retrospectively. We conclude by noting advantages and disadvantages of ESM for collecting data about risk perceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18093044     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00978.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying biopsychosocial aspects in everyday contexts: an integrative methodological approach from the behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Mariona Portell; M Teresa Anguera; Antonio Hernández-Mendo; Gudberg K Jonsson
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?

Authors:  Peter M Wiedemann; Frederik Freudenstein; Christoph Böhmert; Joe Wiart; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.