Literature DB >> 18092560

State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: setting a research agenda and developing an evidence base for practice and public policy. An introduction.

Allen W Heinemann1.   

Abstract

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes and Effectiveness, along with academic, professional, provider, accreditor, and other organizations, sponsored a 2-day State-of-the-Science of Postacute Rehabilitation Symposium in February 2007. The aim of this symposium was to serve as a catalyst for expanded research on postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation so that health policy is founded on a solid evidence base. The goals were to (a) describe the state of our knowledge regarding utilization, organization, and outcomes of postacute rehabilitation settings, (b) identify methodologic and measurement challenges to conducting research, (c) foster the exchange of ideas among researchers, policy makers, industry representatives, funding agency staff, consumers, and advocacy groups, and (d) identify critical questions related to setting, delivery, payment, and effectiveness of rehabilitation services. Plenary presentation and state-of-the-science summaries were organized around 4 themes: (a) the need for improved measurement of key rehabilitation variables and methods to collect and analyze this information, (b) factors that influence access to postacute rehabilitation care, (c) similarities and differences in quality and quantity of services across PAC settings, and (d) effectiveness of postacute rehabilitation services. The full set of symposium articles, including recommendations for future research, appear in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18092560      PMCID: PMC2141727          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  9 in total

Review 1.  Access to postacute rehabilitation.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Assessing the effectiveness of postacute care rehabilitation.

Authors:  Robert L Kane
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  The state-of-the-science: challenges in designing postacute care payment policy.

Authors:  Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  The state-of-the-science: access to postacute care rehabilitation services. A review.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ottenbacher; James E Graham
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Postacute rehabilitation research and policy recommendations.

Authors:  Dexanne B Clohan; Elizabeth M Durkin; Joy Hammel; Patrick Murray; John Whyte; Marcel Dijkers; Bruce M Gans; Daniel E Graves; Allen W Heinemann; Greg Worsowicz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The uniform postacute assessment tool: systematically evaluating the quality of measurement evidence.

Authors:  Mark V Johnston; Daniel Graves; Maureen Greene
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Growth and payment adequacy of medicare postacute care rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sally J Kaplan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation services in postacute care: state-of-the-science. A review.

Authors:  Janet A Prvu Bettger; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Best research evidence for physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Eugene Komaroff; Joel A DeLisa
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.