Literature DB >> 18092378

Early- versus late-onset shock in European intensive care units.

Yasser Sakr1, Jean-Louis Vincent, Tobias Schuerholz, Daniela Filipescu, Alain Romain, Hans Hjelmqvist, Konrad Reinhart.   

Abstract

We investigated the possible differences in epidemiology, clinical course, management, and outcome between early and late occurrence of shock using data from the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Study, a large European multicenter study, which prospectively collected data from all adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted to a participating center within a 2-week period in 2002. Shock was defined as hemodynamic compromise necessitating the administration of vasopressor agents. Early and late shock were defined as onset of shock within the first 2 days in the ICU or later, respectively. Of 3,147 patients, 1,058 (33.6%) had shock at any time, of whom 462 (43.7%) had septic shock. Patients with late shock had a higher incidence of respiratory (87.4 vs. 69.7%, P < 0.001) and hepatic (15.5 vs. 8.7%, P < 0.05) failure, and more often received dopamine (44.7% vs. 34.5%, P < 0.05) and albumin (31.1% vs. 20.3%, P < 0.001) than patients who developed shock early. Intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were greater in patients who developed shock late, rather than early (52.4% vs. 36.8% and 55.3% vs. 43%, respectively, P < 0.02). In a multivariable analysis, late shock was associated with an independent risk of higher ICU mortality in shock patients (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.3, P < 0.001). These observations have important implications in establishing individual prognosis as well as in the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18092378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  12 in total

1.  Use of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, interleukin-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in combination to predict the severity and outcome of abdominal sepsis in rats.

Authors:  Min Gao; Lingli Zhang; Ying Liu; Mingshi Yang; Nian Wang; Kangkai Wang; Danmin Ou; Meidong Liu; Guangwen Chen; Ke Liu; Xianzhong Xiao
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 2.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Manu Shankar-Hari; Gary S Phillips; Mitchell L Levy; Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Clifford S Deutschman; Derek C Angus; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Relationships among initial hospital triage, disease progression and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Jason P Jones; Dominik Aronsky; Barbara E Jones; Michael J Lanspa; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 4.  Using what you get: dynamic physiologic signatures of critical illness.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Applied physiology at the bedside to drive resuscitation algorithms.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Loss of Jak2 selectively suppresses DC-mediated innate immune response and protects mice from lethal dose of LPS-induced septic shock.

Authors:  Jixin Zhong; Ping Yang; Kenjiro Muta; Robert Dong; Mario Marrero; Feili Gong; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predicting Progression to Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Using an Externally Generalizable Machine-Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Gabriel Wardi; Morgan Carlile; Andre Holder; Supreeth Shashikumar; Stephen R Hayden; Shamim Nemati
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Predictors of early progression to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department patients with nonsevere sepsis.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Namita Gupta; Elizabeth Lulaj; Miriam Furgiuele; Idaly Hidalgo; Michael P Jones; Tiphany Jolly; Paul Gennis; Adrienne Birnbaum
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-24

9.  Heparin-Binding Protein Measurement Improves the Prediction of Severe Infection With Organ Dysfunction in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Adam Linder; Ryan Arnold; John H Boyd; Marko Zindovic; Igor Zindovic; Anna Lange; Magnus Paulsson; Patrik Nyberg; James A Russell; David Pritchard; Bertil Christensson; Per Åkesson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Comparison of community-acquired, hospital-acquired, and intensive care unit-acquired acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kuo-Chin Kao; Han-Chung Hu; Meng-Jer Hsieh; Ying-Huang Tsai; Chung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.