INTRODUCTION: Familiar and unfamiliar face perception is typically dissociated by the relative use of internal and external face features. The Williams syndrome (WS) social phenotype emphasises hypersociability, with an interest in interacting with people irrespective of familiarity. The aim is to explore whether unfamiliar face processing is characterised by the typical dissociation between internal and external features in WS, or whether the social stimulus drive towards strangers is linked to atypicalities of unfamiliar face processing. METHOD: The procedure replicates that previously used with typically developing children. Participants with WS (aged 10-18 years) and typically developing comparison participants determine whether two face parts are from the same person or different people, using the whole face, internal, and external features. RESULTS: Only participants with WS, and not typically developing participants, show greater accuracy matching unfamiliar faces from internal than external features. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of atypical unfamiliar face processing in WS may inform models of typical face perception, revealing the origins of the relative advantage for internal features typically associated with familiar but not unfamiliar faces. The results also have implications for understanding more clearly the social phenotype associated with WS.
INTRODUCTION: Familiar and unfamiliar face perception is typically dissociated by the relative use of internal and external face features. The Williams syndrome (WS) social phenotype emphasises hypersociability, with an interest in interacting with people irrespective of familiarity. The aim is to explore whether unfamiliar face processing is characterised by the typical dissociation between internal and external features in WS, or whether the social stimulus drive towards strangers is linked to atypicalities of unfamiliar face processing. METHOD: The procedure replicates that previously used with typically developing children. Participants with WS (aged 10-18 years) and typically developing comparison participants determine whether two face parts are from the same person or different people, using the whole face, internal, and external features. RESULTS: Only participants with WS, and not typically developing participants, show greater accuracy matching unfamiliar faces from internal than external features. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of atypical unfamiliar face processing in WS may inform models of typical face perception, revealing the origins of the relative advantage for internal features typically associated with familiar but not unfamiliar faces. The results also have implications for understanding more clearly the social phenotype associated with WS.
Authors: Anna Järvinen-Pasley; Ralph Adolphs; Anna Yam; Kiley J Hill; Mark Grichanik; Judy Reilly; Debra Mills; Allan L Reiss; Julie R Korenberg; Ursula Bellugi Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Golijeh Golarai; Sungjin Hong; Brian W Haas; Albert M Galaburda; Debra L Mills; Ursula Bellugi; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Allan L Reiss Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: James W Tanaka; Julie M Wolf; Cheryl Klaiman; Kathleen Koenig; Jeffrey Cockburn; Lauren Herlihy; Carla Brown; Sherin S Stahl; Mikle South; James C McPartland; Martha D Kaiser; Robert T Schultz Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Gustav Kuhn; Valerie Benson; Sue Fletcher-Watson; Hanna Kovshoff; Cristin A McCormick; Julie Kirkby; Sue R Leekam Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 1.972