Gang Li1, Per-Erik Engström, Ulf Welander. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. kqgang@bjmu.edu.cn
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: New radiographic techniques have made it possible to color-code intra-oral digital radiographs. The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy and precision of marginal bone level measurements in digital radiographs with and without color coding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periapical digital radiographs of 21 patients were processed with and without a color-coding algorithm. The patients had periodontal surgery immediately after exposure of radiographs, and vertical distances from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical part of the marginal bone were measured clinically. The measured values were considered as a reference standard and subtracted from the corresponding radiographic vertical distance. Seven observers contributed to the radiographic measurements under the same viewing conditions. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between absolute differences of vertical distances obtained from radiographs and their corresponding reference standards in the two types of radiograph. Intra- and inter-observer variability was not significant. CONCLUSION: Color-coded digital radiographs did not provide a more favorable accuracy when assessing marginal alveolar bone levels than black-and-white radiographs and thus did not improve measurement of such levels.
OBJECTIVE: New radiographic techniques have made it possible to color-code intra-oral digital radiographs. The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy and precision of marginal bone level measurements in digital radiographs with and without color coding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periapical digital radiographs of 21 patients were processed with and without a color-coding algorithm. The patients had periodontal surgery immediately after exposure of radiographs, and vertical distances from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical part of the marginal bone were measured clinically. The measured values were considered as a reference standard and subtracted from the corresponding radiographic vertical distance. Seven observers contributed to the radiographic measurements under the same viewing conditions. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between absolute differences of vertical distances obtained from radiographs and their corresponding reference standards in the two types of radiograph. Intra- and inter-observer variability was not significant. CONCLUSION: Color-coded digital radiographs did not provide a more favorable accuracy when assessing marginal alveolar bone levels than black-and-white radiographs and thus did not improve measurement of such levels.
Authors: Abhishek Ranjan Pati; Vijayalakshmi K R; Sanat Kumar Bhuyan; Rajat G Panigrahi; Smita R Priyadarshini; Satyaranjan Misra; Chandravir Singh Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2014-11-20