BACKGROUND: As health care professionals seek to balance technological and regulatory demands with the need to provide patient-centered care, all in an efficient and cost-effective manner, they may see a greater need to improvise or work around intended work practices. Health care professionals acknowledge widespread use of work-arounds, and the literature documents their prevalence and influence on performance. Despite their importance, few studies have focused exclusively on work-arounds. This suggests a key area of need in the research, particularly because work-arounds are frequently cited in the context of serious patient safety consequences. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature concerning work-arounds to elucidate the definition and nature of work-arounds, how work-arounds can be differentiated from similar constructs (e.g., errors, mistakes, and deviance), and the potential causes of work-arounds and to explore potential consequences of work-arounds in health care settings. APPROACH: We conducted a systematic review of the literature concerning work-arounds to develop themes concerning the nature of work-arounds and ideas for future research on the topic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this article, we develop links between work-arounds and potential outcomes, particularly safety outcomes. Moreover, we discuss the manner in which open discussion can allow work-arounds to facilitate work process improvement and the role that climate and culture play in reducing work-arounds.
BACKGROUND: As health care professionals seek to balance technological and regulatory demands with the need to provide patient-centered care, all in an efficient and cost-effective manner, they may see a greater need to improvise or work around intended work practices. Health care professionals acknowledge widespread use of work-arounds, and the literature documents their prevalence and influence on performance. Despite their importance, few studies have focused exclusively on work-arounds. This suggests a key area of need in the research, particularly because work-arounds are frequently cited in the context of serious patient safety consequences. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature concerning work-arounds to elucidate the definition and nature of work-arounds, how work-arounds can be differentiated from similar constructs (e.g., errors, mistakes, and deviance), and the potential causes of work-arounds and to explore potential consequences of work-arounds in health care settings. APPROACH: We conducted a systematic review of the literature concerning work-arounds to develop themes concerning the nature of work-arounds and ideas for future research on the topic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this article, we develop links between work-arounds and potential outcomes, particularly safety outcomes. Moreover, we discuss the manner in which open discussion can allow work-arounds to facilitate work process improvement and the role that climate and culture play in reducing work-arounds.
Authors: Asia Friedman; Jesse C Crosson; Jenna Howard; Elizabeth C Clark; Maria Pellerano; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Benjamin Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Deborah J Cohen Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Magdalena Z Raban; Melissa T Baysari; Mikaela L Jorgensen; Amina Tariq; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Richard J Holden; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Héléne Faye; Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh Journal: Cogn Technol Work Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Kathleen R Stevens; Eileen P Engh; Heather Tubbs-Cooley; Deborah Marks Conley; Tammy Cupit; Ellen D'Errico; Pam DiNapoli; Joleen Lynn Fischer; Ruth Freed; Anne Marie Kotzer; Carolyn L Lindgren; Marie Ann Marino; Lisa Mestas; Jessica Perdue; Rebekah Powers; Patricia Radovich; Karen Rice; Linda P Riley; Peri Rosenfeld; Linda Roussel; Nancy A Ryan-Wenger; Linda Searle-Leach; Nicole M Shonka; Vicki L Smith; Laura Sweatt; Mary Townsend-Gervis; Ellen Wathen; Janice S Withycombe Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.228