Literature DB >> 18090088

Prognostic factors for deterioration of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after nonsurgical treatment.

Takatoshi Shimomura1, Masatoshi Sumi, Kotaro Nishida, Koichiro Maeno, Kou Tadokoro, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Masahiro Kurosaka, Minoru Doita.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study involving 56 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes and prognostic factors for CSM after nonsurgical treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The superiority of surgical treatment over nonsurgical treatment has not been confirmed in mild forms of CSM. Outcomes and prognostic factors for nonsurgical treatment of mild forms of CSM are not well understood.
METHODS: Clinical signs and symptoms of CSM were assessed by Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Nonsurgical treatment was selected for patients with mild forms of CSM (JOA >or=13 patients). Seventy patients with mild forms of CSM were enrolled in the study between 1995 and 2003. The follow-up rate was 80.0%. Prognostic factors that exacerbate clinical symptoms of CSM were examined, such as age, gender, follow-up period, developmental or dynamic factors on plain lateral radiograph, high signal intensity area on T2-weighted sagittal MRI, and the extent of maximum cord compression; partial or circumferential spinal cord compression, on axial MRI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were carried out to test for significant prognostic factors.
RESULTS: There was, on average, no statistically significant deterioration in JOA scores after nonsurgical treatment. However, 11 of 56 patients deteriorated after nonsurgical treatment. The only factor that significantly exacerbated clinical symptoms of CSM was circumferential spinal cord compression in the maximum compression segment on axial MRI. Indeed, 10 of 33 CSM patients with circumferential spinal cord compression on axial MRI deteriorated after nonsurgical treatment.
CONCLUSION: Outcomes of mild forms of CSM during nonsurgical treatment were generally good as shown by average JOA scores. The only prognostic factor for mild forms of CSM was circumferential spinal cord compression in the maximum compression segment on axial MRI. Surgical treatment can be considered for patients with this prognostic factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18090088     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573aee

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years.

Authors:  Zdeněk Kadaňka; Josef Bednařík; Oldřich Novotný; Igor Urbánek; Ladislav Dušek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathy.

Authors:  Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Setsuro Komiya; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Spondylotic cervical myelopathy : Indication of surgical treatment].

Authors:  W Pepke; H Almansour; M Richter; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Does lumbar spinal stenosis increase the risk of spondylotic cervical spinal cord compression?

Authors:  Blanka Adamova; Josef Bednarik; Tereza Andrasinova; Ivana Kovalova; Roman Kopacik; Michal Jabornik; Milos Kerkovsky; Barbora Jakubcova; Jiri Jarkovsky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

Authors:  Tsunehiko Konomi; Akimasa Yasuda; Kanehiro Fujiyoshi; Junichi Yamane; Shinjiro Kaneko; Takatsugu Komiyama; Masakazu Takemitsu; Yoshiyuki Yato; Osahiko Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Current Concepts of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Turkov; Alan Job; Cesar Iturriaga; Rohit B Verma
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

8.  Depression contributed an unsatisfactory surgery outcome among the posterior decompression of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Yaqi Zong; Yuan Xue; Ying Zhao; Huairong Ding; Dong He; Zhiyang Li; Yanming Tang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Chester K Yarbrough; Rory K J Murphy; Wilson Z Ray; Todd J Stewart
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Ling-DE Kong; Ling-Chen Meng; Lin-Feng Wang; Yong Shen; Pan Wang; Zi-Kun Shang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.