| Literature DB >> 18087583 |
Wassana Yantasee1, Yuehe Lin, Kitiya Hongsirikarn, Glen E Fryxell, Raymond Addleman, Charles Timchalk.
Abstract
To support the development and implementation of biological monitoring programs, we need quantitative technologies for measuring xenobiotic exposure. Microanalytical based sensors that work with complex biomatrices such as blood, urine, or saliva are being developed and validated and will improve our ability to make definitive associations between chemical exposures and disease. Among toxic metals, lead continues to be one of the most problematic. Despite considerable efforts to identify and eliminate Pb exposure sources, this metal remains a significant health concern, particularly for young children. Ongoing research focuses on the development of portable metal analyzers that have many advantages over current available technologies, thus potentially representing the next generation of toxic metal analyzers. In this article, we highlight the development and validation of two classes of metal analyzers for the voltammetric detection of Pb, including: a) an analyzer based on flow injection analysis and anodic stripping voltammetry at a mercury-film electrode, and b) Hg-free metal analyzers employing adsorptive stripping voltammetry and novel nanostructure materials that include the self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports and carbon nanotubes. These sensors have been optimized to detect Pb in urine, blood, and saliva as accurately as the state-of-the-art inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry with high reproducibility, and sensitivity allows. These improved and portable analytical sensor platforms will facilitate our ability to conduct biological monitoring programs to understand the relationship between chemical exposure assessment and disease outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: biomonitoring; dosimetry technology; electrochemical sensors; exposure assessment; lead (Pb)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18087583 PMCID: PMC2137133 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Various electrochemical sensors for metal detection: (A) carbon paste working electrode for batch detection, (B) screen-printed electrode, (C) electrochemical cell, and (D) schematic of a portable metal analyzer [10.6 in (length) × 9.7 in (width) × 6.9 in (diameter)]. Abbreviations: A, auxillary; R, reference; W, working. Reproduced from Yantasee et al. (2005b), with permission of Elsevier.
Typical operating conditions of Pb sensors based on Hg-film electrodes and SAMMS-based electrodes.
| Parameter | Condition |
|---|---|
| Flow system | FIA/ASV at Hg-film electrode |
| Sample preparation | |
| Sample volume | 60 μL per measurement |
| Carrier | 5 ppm Hg/0.5 M HCl |
| Flow rate | 1 μL/sec |
| Preconcentration | –1.0 V, 110 sec |
| Detection by SWV | Scan from –0.75 V to –0.45 V |
| Electrode precondition | 0.6 V, 90 sec in carrier |
| Batch measurements | SAMMS-based electrodes |
| SAMMS | 5–10 wt% of SH-, AcPhos-, or IDAA-SAMMS |
| Conductive matrix | Cabon paste, graphite ink, or carbon nanotube paste |
| Samples | Pb in DI water, groundwater, or samples contained 25% rat urine |
| Sample volume | 8 mL waters or 0.5 mL of urine samples |
| Preconcentration | 2–5 min in stirred solutions at open circuit |
| Electrolysis | –0.8 V to –1 V for 60 sec in 0.3–0.5 M HNO3 or HCl |
| Detection by SWV | Scan from –0.7 V to –0.35 V |
| Electrode cleaning | Often not required |
Abbreviations: AcPhos, acetamide phosphonic acid; DI, deionized; IDAA, iminodiacetic acid; SWV, square-wave stripping voltammetry.
Figure 2Pb signals as a function of Pb concentrations in solution without blood and with blood samples prepared by spiking Pb before and after proteins are removed; inset shows the corresponding voltammograms of Pb in 10-vol% blood sample. Reproduced from Yantasee et al. (2007), with permission of Springer.
Figure 3Pb signals as a function of Pb concentrations in samples with 0, 10, and 50 vol% of urine; inset shows the corresponding Pb voltammograms in 50%-urine samples. Reproduced from Yantasee et al. (2007), with permission of Springer.
Summary of figures of merit of various analyzers for the detection of Pb.
| Sensor type | Electrode specifications | Conditions | Linear slope (μA/ppb Pb) | Data range (ppb Pb) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIA/AdSV | Hg film on glassy electrode | Without urine | 0.030 | 0–50 | 0.996 | |
| With 10 vol% urine | 0.032 | 0–10 | 0.953 | |||
| With 50 vol% urine
| 0.017 | 0–50 | 0.995 | |||
| Without blood
| 0.035 | 0–20 | 0.993 | |||
| Pb spiked before protein removal | 0.033 | 0–20 | 0.999 | |||
| Pb spiked after protein removal
| 0.035 | 0–20 | 0.991 | |||
| In DI water, but similar to samples
| 0.463 | 0–10 | 0.990 | |||
| SH–SAMMS–carbon paste | 5 wt% SH–SAMMS–carbon paste | Groundwater
| 0.025 | 0–50 | 0.997 | New results |
| IDAA–SAMMS–CNT | 10 wt% IDAA–SAMMS–CNT paste | Sample containing 25 vol% urine
| 0.316 | 0–20 | 0.998 | New results |
| SIA/AdSV | 10 wt% AcPhos–SAMMS–carbon paste | DI water
| 0.013 | 0–25 | 0.995 | |
| Disposable sensors | 10 wt% AcPhos–SAMMS–graphite ink | DI water
| 0.034 | 0–500 | 0.999 |
Abbreviations: DI, deionized; LDL, low density protein; NMWL, nominal molecular weight limit; nV/A, peak area, nanovolts/amp.
Peak area was used as signal and the unit of slope was nV/A per ppb.
Pb concentrations in spiked saliva, urine, and blood obtained from naïve rats.
| Pb concentration (ppb) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological samples | ICP-MS | Microanalyzer | Reference |
| Saliva | 2.2 ± NA | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 6.2 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | ||
| 11.6 ± 1.4 | 11.9 ± 0.4 | ||
| Urine | 13.5 ± 0.1 | 14.1 ± 2.0 | |
| 25.9 ± NA | 23.4 ± 1.2 | ||
| Blood | 64.5 ± 8.0 | 58.0 ± 1.1 | |
| 110.9 ± 2.3 | 114.6 ± 0.4 | ||
Data are presented as mean ± SD, all measured with duplicate (n = 2) except
(n = 1) and
(n = 4).
Figure 4Voltammetric responses of Cd and Pb at the microanalyzer, measured in single component Pb and Cd solutions and a multicomponent Pb/Cd solution. Operating conditions are described in Table 1; inset shows the corresponding voltammograms.
Figure 5Voltammetric responses of Cu at the microanalyzer. Operating conditions are described in Table 1; inset shows the voltammograms of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 μg/L of Cu. y = 0.16x; R2 = 1.00
Figure 6A hybrid of (A) self-assembled monolayer and (B) ordered mesoporous silica resulting in (C) SAMMS structure with (D) three differing organic moieties as the monolayers. SiO2, silicon dioxide.
Figure 7A Pb calibration curve at a 10 wt% AcPhos–SAMMS screen-printed sensor after 5-min preconcentration. Inset (A) shows the corresponding Pb voltammograms; inset (B) shows the simultaneous detection of 90 ppb Cd, 18 ppb Pb, and 18 ppb Cu. y = 0.034x; R2 = 0.999. Reproduced from Yantasee et al. (2005a), with permission of Elsevier.
Figure 8Calibration curve of Pb in samples containing 25 vol% urine measured after 5 min preconcentration at a IDAA–SAMMS–CNT paste electrode; inset shows the corresponding Pb voltammograms. y = 0.316x; R2 = 0.998.
Detection of background blood Pb levels in blood obtained from 10 adult males.a
| Pb concentration (ppb) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donor no. | Anticoagulant | ICP-MS | Microanalyzer | Percent error |
| 1 | HP | 38.7 ± 0.1 | 36.5 ± 0.1 | 5.5 |
| 1 | CPDA | 37.9 ± 0.5 | 40.0 ± 1.4 | 5.6 |
| 1 | EDTA | 40.6 ± 0.0 | 40.4 ± 0.1 | 5.7 |
| 1 | NaC | 36.9 ± 0.1 | 39.0 ± 1.3 | 3.8 |
| 2 | NaC | 28.3 ± 0.7 | 27.2 ± 0.2 | 0.5 |
| 3 | NaC | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 16.6 ± 0.5 | 2.6 |
| 4 | NaC | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 4.5 |
| 5 | NaC | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 28.9 |
| 6 | NaC | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 13.1 ± 0.2 | 4.1 |
| 7 | NaC | 11.6 ± 0.6 | 11.7 ± 0.3 | 0.9 |
| 8 | NaC | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 5.9 |
| 9 | NaC | 124.5 ± 3.8 | 127.8 ± 1.2 | 2.7 |
| 10 | NaC | 19.9 ± 0.5 | 20.6 ± 0.1 | 3.3 |
Abbreviations: CPDA, citrate, phosphate, dextrose, and adenine; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetate; HP, heparin; NaC, sodium citrate.
Operating conditions are described in Table 1.
Results are presented as mean ± SD, all measured with duplicates.
Blood samples were obtained from a commercial supplier of human tissues (Golden West Biologicals, Inc., CA) and were not prescreened for Pb exposure.
Pb concentrations were calculated from Pb signals using the slope value (0.05 μA/ppb Pb) of the calibration curve constructed with 0–20 ppb of Pb in a pure medium without adding blood (see “Pb, single” curve of Figure 4).