C E Hallgreen1, K D Hall. 1. Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the mathematical relationship between changes of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and total body fat mass (FM) during weight loss. DESIGN: We hypothesized that changes of VAT mass are allometrically related to changes of FM, regardless of the type of weight-loss intervention, as defined by the differential equation dVAT/dFM=k x VAT/FM, where k is a dimensionless constant. We performed a systematic search of the published literature for studies that included measurements of VAT changes via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging along with measurements of FM changes by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, hydrodensitometry, air-displacement plethysmography or whole-body MRI or CT imaging. We then examined whether or not the data could be explained by the allometric model. RESULT: We found 37 published studies satisfying our search criteria, representing 1407 men and women of various ethnicities, degrees of adiposity and weight-loss interventions. The hypothesized allometric equation relating changes of VAT and FM accurately modeled the data for both men and women and for all methods of weight loss studied. The best-fit value for the dimensionless constant was k=1.3+/-0.1 and the resulting model had an R(2)=0.73. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to reveal an allometric relationship between changes of VAT and FM that holds for both genders as well as a wide variety of weight-loss interventions including bariatric surgery, caloric restriction with or without exercise and exercise alone. We conclude that changes of VAT are primarily determined by FM changes as well as the initial VAT to FM ratio.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the mathematical relationship between changes of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and total body fat mass (FM) during weight loss. DESIGN: We hypothesized that changes of VAT mass are allometrically related to changes of FM, regardless of the type of weight-loss intervention, as defined by the differential equation dVAT/dFM=k x VAT/FM, where k is a dimensionless constant. We performed a systematic search of the published literature for studies that included measurements of VAT changes via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging along with measurements of FM changes by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, hydrodensitometry, air-displacement plethysmography or whole-body MRI or CT imaging. We then examined whether or not the data could be explained by the allometric model. RESULT: We found 37 published studies satisfying our search criteria, representing 1407 men and women of various ethnicities, degrees of adiposity and weight-loss interventions. The hypothesized allometric equation relating changes of VAT and FM accurately modeled the data for both men and women and for all methods of weight loss studied. The best-fit value for the dimensionless constant was k=1.3+/-0.1 and the resulting model had an R(2)=0.73. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to reveal an allometric relationship between changes of VAT and FM that holds for both genders as well as a wide variety of weight-loss interventions including bariatric surgery, caloric restriction with or without exercise and exercise alone. We conclude that changes of VAT are primarily determined by FM changes as well as the initial VAT to FM ratio.
Authors: E Doucet; S St-Pierre; N Alméras; P Mauriège; J P Després; D Richard; C Bouchard; A Tremblay Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: E Doucet; S St-Pierre; N Alméras; P Imbeault; P Mauriège; A Pascot; J-P Després; A Tremblay Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ellen W Demerath; Nikki L Rogers; Derek Reed; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Roger M Siervogel; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Bradford Towne; Stefan A Czerwinski Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Christos G Galanakis; Markos Daskalakis; Andreas Manios; Argyro Xyda; Apostolos H Karantanas; John Melissas Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Bradley M Appelhans; Rasa Kazlauskaite; Kelly Karavolos; Imke Janssen; Howard M Kravitz; Sheila Dugan; John W Burns; Karla Shipp-Johnson; Lynda H Powell Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Russell J de Souza; George A Bray; Vincent J Carey; Kevin D Hall; Meryl S LeBoff; Catherine M Loria; Nancy M Laranjo; Frank M Sacks; Steven R Smith Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert H Coker; Rick H Williams; Sophie E Yeo; Patrick M Kortebein; Don L Bodenner; Philip A Kern; William J Evans Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M J Müller; V Baracos; A Bosy-Westphal; A G Dulloo; J Eckel; K C H Fearon; K D Hall; A Pietrobelli; T I A Sørensen; J Speakman; P Trayhurn; M Visser; S B Heymsfield Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Albert A de Graaf; Andreas P Freidig; Baukje De Roos; Neema Jamshidi; Matthias Heinemann; Johan A C Rullmann; Kevin D Hall; Martin Adiels; Ben van Ommen Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 4.475