Literature DB >> 18086133

Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty.

Stefano Rigattieri1, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Pasquale Silvestri, Cristian Di Russo, Carmine Musto, Giuseppe Ferraiuolo, Paolo Loschiavo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment strategy of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing primary angioplasty is still unclear. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-culprit vessels simultaneously or soon after primary angioplasty is feasible and safe, but available data failed to consistently show a benefit in long-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared in-hospital and long-term outcomes for patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD treated by primary angioplasty with (Group 1, n=64) or without (Group 2, n=46) early, staged PCI of other angiographically significant coronary lesions. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction after staged, elective PCI, stroke, stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and vascular complications. MACE at follow-up were defined as a composite of death, stroke, stent thrombosis, any coronary revascularization, and re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome.
RESULTS: Group 1 patients underwent staged PCI 5.9 +/- 3.5 days after primary angioplasty. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months (392 +/- 236 days). The incidence of in-hospital MACE was 20.3% in Group 1 and 10.8% in Group 2 (P=0.186); the incidence of out of hospital MACE was 9.3% in Group 1 and 23.9% in Group 2 (P=0.037). In Group 1 in-hospital MACE were driven by periprocedural myocardial infarction after the elective procedure, which occurred in 15.6% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that multivessel, staged PCI in STEMI patients is associated with a low incidence of adverse events at follow-up but with a higher incidence of in-hospital MACE, mainly driven by periprocedural myocardial infarction during the elective procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086133     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  14 in total

Review 1.  Multivessel versus culprit-only revascularization: one time versus staged procedures for the ACS population.

Authors:  Pablo Codner; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Daniel Y Lu; Ming Zhong; Dmitriy N Feldman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-07

Review 3.  Complete versus culprit only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a perspective on recent trials and recommendations.

Authors:  Gabriela Andries; Sahil Khera; Robert J Timmermans; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: does every culprit lesion require revascularization?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; David P Faxon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Elisa Filippini; Pier Camillo Pavesi; Gianfranco Tortorici; Gianni Casella; Pietro Sangiorgio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Rationale and design of EXPLORE: a randomized, prospective, multicenter trial investigating the impact of recanalization of a chronic total occlusion on left ventricular function in patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  René J van der Schaaf; Bimmer E Claessen; Loes P Hoebers; Niels J Verouden; Jacques J Koolen; Maarten J Suttorp; Emanuele Barbato; Matthijs Bax; Bradley H Strauss; Göran K Olivecrona; Vegard Tuseth; Dietmar Glogar; Truls Råmunddal; Jan G Tijssen; Jan J Piek; José P S Henriques
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Culprit Vessel Only Versus Complete Revascularisation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Should we Stay or Stage?

Authors:  Matthias Hasun; Franz Weidinger
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

8.  Impact of multivessel revascularization on health status outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jae-Sik Jang; John A Spertus; Suzanne V Arnold; Ali Shafiq; Anna Grodzinsky; Timothy J Fendler; Adam C Salisbury; Fengming Tang; Edward J McNulty; J Aaron Grantham; David J Cohen; Amit P Amin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease?

Authors:  Petr Widimsky; David R Holmes
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Davide Presutti; Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Antonino G M Marullo; Marzia Lotrionte; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.