Literature DB >> 18086110

Efficacy and safety of low-pressured and short-time dilation in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal.

Takeshi Tsujino1, Takao Kawabe, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Hirofumi Kogure, Osamu Togawa, Toshihiko Arizumi, Yukiko Ito, Saburo Matsubara, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Yousuke Nakai, Naoki Sasahira, Kenji Hirano, Nobuo Toda, Yutaka Komatsu, Minoru Tada, Haruhiko Yoshida, Masao Omata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has been advocated as an alternative therapy to endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. However, studies have shown that EPBD may increase the risk for pancreatitis. Pancreatitis after EPBD is believed to be related to papillary damage after balloon dilation. We changed the dilation method to a theoretically less hazardous one. This modified dilation method was compared with the initial method.
METHODS: A total of 324 patients with bile duct stones underwent EPBD by the modified method between June 1999 and June 2003. Three hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing EPBD by the initial method served as a historical control group. The success rate of stone removal and the incidence of procedure-related pancreatitis were compared between the two groups. In the modified method, the balloon was inflated until disappearance of the balloon waist, and the pressure was then maintained for 15 s. In the initial method, the balloon was inflated at 8 atmospheres for 2 min.
RESULTS: Bile duct stones were successfully removed in 313 of 324 patients (96.6%) in the modified group and in 314 of 324 patients (96.9%) in the initial group (not significant). The incidence of post-procedure pancreatitis showed a lower tendency in the modified group (4.0%, 13/324) than in the initial group (7.4%, 24/324) (P-value = 0.0626). The severity of pancreatitis was significantly reduced in the modified group.
CONCLUSION: The modified method of EPBD is feasible for extraction of bile duct stones, and may potentially decrease the incidence of severe post-EPBD pancreatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086110     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  15 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Masahiro Hayashi; Jun-Ichi Senoo; Yuko Kusakabe; Shin Yasui; Rintaro Mikata; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-05-25

Review 2.  Reappraisal of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kwok-Hung Lai; Hoi-Hung Chan; Tzung-Jiun Tsai; Jin-Shiung Cheng; Ping-I Hsu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

3.  The ballooning time in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Byoung Wook Bang; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Jung Il Lee; Jin-Woo Lee; Kye Sook Kwon; Hyung Gil Kim; Yong Woon Shin; Young Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal in patients 60 years old or younger.

Authors:  Takeshi Tsujino; Haruhiko Yoshida; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yukiko Ito; Yoko Yashima; Hiroshi Yagioka; Hirofumi Kogure; Takashi Sasaki; Toshihiko Arizumi; Osamu Togawa; Saburo Matsubara; Yousuke Nakai; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Minoru Tada; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Naminatsu Takahara; Hiroyuki Isayama; Takashi Sasaki; Takeshi Tsujino; Nobuo Toda; Naoki Sasahira; Suguru Mizuno; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hirofumi Kogure; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Yousuke Nakai; Kenji Hirano; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?

Authors:  Toshio Fujisawa; Koichi Kagawa; Kantaro Hisatomi; Kensuke Kubota; Atsushi Nakajima; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: revival of the old technique.

Authors:  Seung Uk Jeong; Sung-Hoon Moon; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Brushing the distal biliary stricture in the surrounding of the papilla increased the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A retrospective study using propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Kunihiro Kato; Satoshi Sugimori; Yuki Kakiya; Hirotsugu Maruyama; Shusei Fukunaga; Yasuaki Nagami; Masatsugu Shiba; Tetsuya Tanigawa; Toshio Watanabe; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 9.  Current status of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Koichi Aiura; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.027

10.  Is the Balloon Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation (EPBD) Related to the Occurrence of Post-EPBD Pancreatitis?

Authors:  Dong Uk Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.