Literature DB >> 18085942

Response coding and visuomotor transformation in the Simon task: the role of action goals.

Ivonne Buhlmann1, Carlo Umiltà, Edmund Wascher.   

Abstract

Manual responses can be defined by differing response parameters. Any of them may generate a Simon effect. For all those response parameters, the same implementation of the Simon effect (in terms of subserving mechanism) is assumed. In 3 experiments, subjects had to respond with either fingers or sticks. Temporal properties of the Simon effect changed with response parameters relevant in a task. The Simon effect for manual responses decayed. For stick responses, in which the action goal differed from the anatomical mapping of the acting hand, a sustained Simon effect was observed. However, if the action goal for stick responses was not instrumental for selecting the correct response, the Simon effect decayed. The findings are consistent with the notion of different mechanisms involved in generating a Simon effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085942     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; James D Miles; Giulia Baroni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

3.  The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

4.  Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli.

Authors:  Antonello Pellicano; Cristina Iani; Natale Vincenzo Maiorana; Houpand Horoufchin; Sandro Rubichi; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Ferdinand Binkofski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.

Authors:  Kiril Kostov; Armina Janyan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-04

6.  Mirrored visual feedback limits distal effect anticipation.

Authors:  Christine Sutter; Stefan Ladwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory spatial attention capture, disengagement, and response selection in normal aging.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeremy T Nelson; Jaelle Scheuerman; Kristen B Venable; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.348

9.  Conceptual response distance and intervening keys distinguish action goals in the Stroop color-identification task.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

10.  Dynamic structure of joint-action stimulus-response activity.

Authors:  MaryLauren Malone; Ramon D Castillo; Heidi Kloos; John G Holden; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.