Literature DB >> 18085932

Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: blending care with control.

Jennifer L Skeem1, Jennifer Eno Louden, Devon Polaschek, Jacqueline Camp.   

Abstract

Traditional measures of the therapeutic alliance do not capture the dual roles inherent in relationships with involuntary clients. Providers not only care for, but also have control over, involuntary clients. In 2 studies of probationers mandated to psychiatric treatment (n=90; n=322), the authors developed and validated the revised Dual-Role Relationships Inventory (DRI-R). The authors found that (a) relationship quality in mandated treatment involves caring and fairness, trust, and an authoritative (not authoritarian) style, (b) the DRI-R assesses these domains of relationship quality, is internally consistent, and relates in a theoretically coherent pattern with ratings of within-session behavior and with measures of the therapeutic alliance, relationship satisfaction, symptoms, and treatment motivation, and (c) the quality of dual-role relationships predicts future compliance with the rules, as assessed by probation violations and revocation. The DRI-R covaries with multiple domains more strongly than a leading measure of the therapeutic alliance, suggesting that it better captures the nature and effect of relationship quality in mandated treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085932     DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  20 in total

1.  Case managers' perspectives on the therapeutic alliance: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sara Bressi Nath; Leslie B Alexander; Phyllis L Solomon
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  An exploration of perceived coercion into psychological assessment and treatment within a low secure forensic mental health service.

Authors:  Cassandra Simms-Sawyers; Helen Miles; Joel Harvey
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 3.  Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sean A Kidd; Larry Davidson; Kwame McKenzie
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-02-13

Review 4.  Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis.

Authors:  Robert D Morgan; David B Flora; Daryl G Kroner; Jeremy F Mills; Femina Varghese; Jarrod S Steffan
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2012-02

5.  Youth's Perceptions of Parental Support and Parental Knowledge as Moderators of the Association Between Youth-Probation Officer Relationship and Probation Non-compliance.

Authors:  Sarah Vidal; Jennifer Woolard
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-10-20

6.  Parole officer-parolee relationships and HIV risk behaviors during community supervision.

Authors:  Traci C Green; Jennifer Johnson; Magdalena Harrington; Enrique R Pouget; Anne G Rhodes; Faye S Taxman; Daniel J O'Connell; Steven S Martin; Michael Prendergast; Peter D Friedmann
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-10

7.  Comparing Public Safety Outcomes for Traditional Probation vs Specialty Mental Health Probation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Skeem; Sarah Manchak; Lina Montoya
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Engagement processes in model programs for community reentry from prison for people with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Beth Angell; Elizabeth Matthews; Stacey Barrenger; Amy C Watson; Jeffrey Draine
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-18

9.  Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  Matthew W Epperson; Leon Sawh; Sophia P Sarantakos
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.790

10.  What Factors Work in Mental Health Court?: A Consumer Perspective.

Authors:  Kelli E Canada; Alana J Gunn
Journal:  J Offender Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.