BACKGROUND: Radical trachelectomy is a surgical procedure intended to preserve fertility in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma in which the cervix is amputated in continuity with the parametrium and upper vagina, thereby sparing the uterus and adnexa. Follow-up is performed with periodic cytology specimens. The objective of the current study was to analyze the cytologic findings after this novel procedure. METHODS: Isthmic and vaginal Papanicolaou-stained ThinPrep cytology specimens taken from patients after radical vaginal and abdominal trachelectomy were reviewed. The specimens were also analyzed for the presence of benign endocervical cells, lower uterine segment glandular cells, endometrial stromal cells, and endometrial cells. The findings were correlated with the original diagnosis and follow-up, which included subsequent cytology specimens and biopsies. RESULTS: Cytology specimens (n = 223) from 44 patients were included in this study. An endometrial component was identified in 131 of the cases (59%). Twenty-eight cases were diagnosed as abnormal in the original cytology examination. Twenty of these cases and 5 additional cases that were diagnosed cytologically as benign had subsequent biopsies. The biopsies confirmed the presence of a lesion in only 4 of 25 biopsies (3 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 1 adenosquamous carcinoma). All cases diagnosed as atypical glandular cells represented tubal metaplasia, lower uterine segment glandular cells, or endometrial stromal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Cytology specimens after trachelectomy frequently contain glandular cells from the lower uterine segment epithelium or endometrial stromal cells, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Tubal metaplasia is also a potential pitfall in these specimens. Pathologists and gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the potential pitfalls in the surveillance of smears after trachelectomy. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society
BACKGROUND: Radical trachelectomy is a surgical procedure intended to preserve fertility in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma in which the cervix is amputated in continuity with the parametrium and upper vagina, thereby sparing the uterus and adnexa. Follow-up is performed with periodic cytology specimens. The objective of the current study was to analyze the cytologic findings after this novel procedure. METHODS: Isthmic and vaginal Papanicolaou-stained ThinPrep cytology specimens taken from patients after radical vaginal and abdominal trachelectomy were reviewed. The specimens were also analyzed for the presence of benign endocervical cells, lower uterine segment glandular cells, endometrial stromal cells, and endometrial cells. The findings were correlated with the original diagnosis and follow-up, which included subsequent cytology specimens and biopsies. RESULTS: Cytology specimens (n = 223) from 44 patients were included in this study. An endometrial component was identified in 131 of the cases (59%). Twenty-eight cases were diagnosed as abnormal in the original cytology examination. Twenty of these cases and 5 additional cases that were diagnosed cytologically as benign had subsequent biopsies. The biopsies confirmed the presence of a lesion in only 4 of 25 biopsies (3 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 1 adenosquamous carcinoma). All cases diagnosed as atypical glandular cells represented tubal metaplasia, lower uterine segment glandular cells, or endometrial stromal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Cytology specimens after trachelectomy frequently contain glandular cells from the lower uterine segment epithelium or endometrial stromal cells, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Tubal metaplasia is also a potential pitfall in these specimens. Pathologists and gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the potential pitfalls in the surveillance of smears after trachelectomy. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society
Authors: Ramez N Eskander; Leslie M Randall; Michael L Berman; Krishnansu S Tewari; Philip J Disaia; Robert E Bristow Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 8.661