BACKGROUND: Response rates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are now reported based on the cumulative incidence of a single-time best response. The study aim was to examine the significance of different response criteria for CML on imatinib therapy. METHODS: In all, 276 patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib therapy were analyzed. Cytogenetic and molecular responses were coded as to single best response and response at specific intervals of treatment. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) with imatinib was 91%; however, the incidence of CGCR at 48 months into therapy was only 78%. Similarly, the incidence of major molecular responses (best cumulative vs landmark at 48 months) were 74% versus 62%, and of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts 38% versus 24%. There was a strong association between achievement of major cytogenetic response (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positivity <or=35%) at 6 months to 12 months and survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS). Achievement of major molecular response (vs lesser molecular response) in patients in complete cytogenetic response was not associated with significant differences in survival, but showed some association with PFS. Durable CGCR and major molecular responses (documented continuously for >or=12 months) were associated with longer PFS duration but not with survival duration differences. Of interest, major molecular responses documented at least twice were noted in 71% of patients on imatinib therapy; undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts documented at least twice were noted in 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Achievement and durability of CGCR and of major and complete molecular responses at landmark times predict outcome in CML, and may help in comparing the efficacy of different treatments. Cancer 2008. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Response rates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are now reported based on the cumulative incidence of a single-time best response. The study aim was to examine the significance of different response criteria for CML on imatinib therapy. METHODS: In all, 276 patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib therapy were analyzed. Cytogenetic and molecular responses were coded as to single best response and response at specific intervals of treatment. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) with imatinib was 91%; however, the incidence of CGCR at 48 months into therapy was only 78%. Similarly, the incidence of major molecular responses (best cumulative vs landmark at 48 months) were 74% versus 62%, and of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts 38% versus 24%. There was a strong association between achievement of major cytogenetic response (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positivity <or=35%) at 6 months to 12 months and survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS). Achievement of major molecular response (vs lesser molecular response) in patients in complete cytogenetic response was not associated with significant differences in survival, but showed some association with PFS. Durable CGCR and major molecular responses (documented continuously for >or=12 months) were associated with longer PFS duration but not with survival duration differences. Of interest, major molecular responses documented at least twice were noted in 71% of patients on imatinib therapy; undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts documented at least twice were noted in 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Achievement and durability of CGCR and of major and complete molecular responses at landmark times predict outcome in CML, and may help in comparing the efficacy of different treatments. Cancer 2008. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Neil P Shah; Jorge E Cortes; Michele Baccarani; Mohan B Agarwal; María Soledad Undurraga; Jianxiang Wang; Juan Julio Kassack Ipiña; Dong-Wook Kim; Michinori Ogura; Carolina Pavlovsky; Christian Junghanss; Jorge H Milone; Franck E Nicolini; Tadeusz Robak; Jan Van Droogenbroeck; Edo Vellenga; M Brigid Bradley-Garelik; Chao Zhu; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: Blood Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tariq I Mughal; Jerald P Radich; Richard A Van Etten; Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Tomasz Skorski; Farhad Ravandi; Daniel J DeAngelo; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Giovanni Martinelli; Ayalew Tefferi Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Timothy P Hughes; Andreas Hochhaus; Susan Branford; Martin C Müller; Jaspal S Kaeda; Letizia Foroni; Brian J Druker; François Guilhot; Richard A Larson; Stephen G O'Brien; Marc S Rudoltz; Manisha Mone; Elisabeth Wehrle; Vijay Modur; John M Goldman; Jerald P Radich Journal: Blood Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 22.113