Literature DB >> 18085531

Attenuation of DNA damage-induced p53 expression by arsenic: a possible mechanism for arsenic co-carcinogenesis.

Shengwen Shen1, Jane Lee, Michael Weinfeld, X Chris Le.   

Abstract

Inhibition of DNA repair processes has been suggested as one predominant mechanism in arsenic co-genotoxicity. However, the underlying mode of action responsible for DNA repair inhibition by arsenic remains elusive. To further elucidate the mechanism of repair inhibition by arsenic, we examined the effect of trivalent inorganic and methylated arsenic metabolites on the repair of benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts in normal human primary fibroblasts and their effect on repair-related protein expression. We observed that monomethylarsonous acid (MMA(III)) was the most potent inhibitor of the DNA repair. MMA(III) did not change the expression levels of some key repair proteins involved upstream of the dual incision in the global nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, including p48, XPC, xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A (XPA), and p62-TFIIH. However, it led to a marked impairment of p53 induction in response to BPDE treatment. The abrogated p53 expression translated into reduced p53 DNA-binding activity, suggesting a possibility of downregulating downstream repair genes by p53. A p53-null cell line failed to exhibit the inhibitory effect of MMA(III) on NER, implicating a role for p53 in the NER inhibition by MMA(III). Further investigation revealed that MMA(III) dramatically inhibited p53 phosphorylation at serine 15, implying that MMA(III) destabilized p53 by inhibiting its phosphorylation. Because p53 is required for proficient global NER, our data suggest that arsenic inhibits NER through suppressing p53 induction in response to DNA damage in cells with normal p53 gene expression. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18085531     DOI: 10.1002/mc.20406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Carcinog        ISSN: 0899-1987            Impact factor:   4.784


  17 in total

Review 1.  State of the science review of the health effects of inorganic arsenic: Perspectives for future research.

Authors:  Paul B Tchounwou; Clement G Yedjou; Udensi K Udensi; Maricica Pacurari; Jacqueline J Stevens; Anita K Patlolla; Felicite Noubissi; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.119

2.  Toxicity of depleted uranium complexes is independent of p53 activity.

Authors:  Ellie Heintze; Camille Aguilera; Malia Davis; Avery Fricker; Qiang Li; Jesse Martinez; Matthew J Gage
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.155

3.  Identification of novel gene targets and putative regulators of arsenic-associated DNA methylation in human urothelial cells and bladder cancer.

Authors:  Julia E Rager; Sloane K Tilley; Samantha E Tulenko; Lisa Smeester; Paul D Ray; Andrew Yosim; Jenna M Currier; María C Ishida; Maria Del Carmen González-Horta; Blanca Sánchez-Ramírez; Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias; Daniela S Gutiérrez-Torres; Zuzana Drobná; Luz M Del Razo; Gonzalo G García-Vargas; William Y Kim; Yi-Hui Zhou; Fred A Wright; Miroslav Stýblo; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Potential effect modifiers of the arsenic-bladder cancer risk relationship.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Dalsu Baris; Richard Waddell; Laura E Beane Freeman; Joanne S Colt; Molly Schwenn; Alison Johnson; Mary H Ward; Gm Monawar Hosain; Lee E Moore; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Nathaniel Rothman; Margaret R Karagas; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Inorganic arsenic inhibits the nucleotide excision repair pathway and reduces the expression of XPC.

Authors:  Nathaniel Holcomb; Mamta Goswami; Sung Gu Han; Tim Scott; John D'Orazio; David K Orren; C Gary Gairola; Isabel Mellon
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-02-16

7.  Low level exposure to monomethyl arsonous acid-induced the over-production of inflammation-related cytokines and the activation of cell signals associated with tumor progression in a urothelial cell model.

Authors:  C Escudero-Lourdes; M K Medeiros; M C Cárdenas-González; S M Wnek; J A Gandolfi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  CD44v6 expression in human skin keratinocytes as a possible mechanism for carcinogenesis associated with chronic arsenic exposure.

Authors:  S Huang; S Guo; F Guo; Q Yang; X Xiao; M Murata; S Ohnishi; S Kawanishi; N Ma
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 9.  Arsenic binding to proteins.

Authors:  Shengwen Shen; Xing-Fang Li; William R Cullen; Michael Weinfeld; X Chris Le
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination is required for repair of Arsenite-induced replication lesions in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Songmin Ying; Katie Myers; Sarah Bottomley; Thomas Helleday; Helen E Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.